Friday, May 18, 2007 - 2:32 PM
"They are interested in determining the optimal mixture of firms, policies, and government institutions that can foster radical path-breaking innovations."
May I ask whether the book defines radical innovations?
Sorry, "whether" in the above post should be "how". Innovation is rarely differentiated between radical and whatever isn't radical, and I would be interested to know the criteria they use for making the distinction.
I was taught international security by Stephan Halper a few years back - "as rants go, it's an interesting rant." - absolutely.
The guy is pretty angry, he was a security advisor to the white house across four presidents (he may have managed a political campaign for George Bush Senior at one point), but fell out of politics over the iraq thing, which he is not happy about... have a feeling that would have been made clear in the book....
dan, i remember you saying you were reading lukacs book on kennan. did you ever post your thoughts on that? what did you think of it?
Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.
Read More
(4)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE