Friday, November 16, 2007 - 9:16 PM
Admittedly I'm only responding to the NYTimes review of Mead's book, but they essentially take him to task for assuming a benign imperialism in which no nation joins an empire against its will and no population is ever subject to violence. Oh, and Iraq has no strategic consequences worth mentioning. I'm exaggerating to a certain extent, but none of these gripes appear in your paragraph. Is it because they're not there or you consider them unimportant?
Um, why isn't "God and Gold" the international relations pick and "One Economics" the general interest pick?
Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.
Read More
(2)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE