Tuesday, July 8, 2008 - 1:32 PM
"If nothing else, breaking this kind of promise does exact some modest cost on the future leader who has to make the reversal."
This argument was also (originally?) made by Lloyd Gruber in "Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions" (Princeton, 2000). Among other insights, he pointed out that rational institution designers would try to lower the costs of membership to placate potential future domestic leaders (i.e. make it more palatable for them to stay in the institution) and *raise* the costs of exit, to make it more likely that institutions would be sticky and/or permanent. I wonder if you are aware of his work.
The EU will celebrate Turkey's admission by eliminating all agricultural subsidies.
It should at least also be supported by many. Balance our budgets comes to mind. End war was already tried so it lacks credibility. End poverty tried somewhat. Educate the world has a nice ring to it.
How about a pledge that by 2100 all the world's governments will allow free trade? That should be easy enough.
The G8 could promise to remake its membership to reflect real economic power by 2100.
I think worldwide availability of quesadillas would be a good thing. If everyone were fully, gastronomically satisfied, wouldn't world peace be a no-brainer?
Oh, wait... what was that you said about some people wanting control??? OK, they should grill the chicken.
Lloyd is that you posting again? Go ahead and use your name, we don't mind if you shamelessly give yourself props.
How 'bout: High speed internet connections for all and a chicken in every pot by 2100!
@7:
Hahaha, no, no, I am who I say I am. Grad student in Poli Sci at Dan's old school, U of C. Just took the IR prelim about 5 weeks ago, so it's all still very fresh. Hopefully it'll all be gone by the end of the summer.
Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.
Read More
(9)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE