Monday, July 14, 2008 - 3:55 AM
Q: Do you use a blackberry or email? Mr. McCain: No.What's interesting is that McCain is not the only luminary who fits this category. We've known for some time, for example, that Condoleezza Rice does not use e-mail; I would wager she does not use a Blackberry. It's not just Republicans. Gail Sheehy, in her Vanity Fair story on Hillary Clinton's campaign, reveals that, "Bill Clinton still doesn’t use e-mail or own a BlackBerry." Here's my question -- is is that shocking that a major party candidate for president, a secretary of state, and a former-head-of-state-turned-head-of-a-major-international NGO don't use the interwebs like you or me? To be sure, using the internet has always been strongly correlated with education and income. One would expect, therefore, that as one's professional standing rises, so does their e-mail access/Blackberry usage. However, I could also speculate that, after a certain point, the most precious commodity someone has is time, and therefore one can outsource aides to notify you of urgent e-mails and breaking news. Indeed, as one hits Davos-level elite status, I can see there being an incentive to free one's self of any tethers to the interwebs, giving off the appearance of not needing to be connected to the web 24/7. I honestly don't know -- it might just be that politicians like McCain, Rice and Clinton are outliers. Are they out of touch, too important for the Internet, or both?
Yes, well as you noted, they almost certainly have people to handle their e-mail/Blackberry duties for them, don't they? It's a nice life, if you don't weaken.
You do well to associate McCain in his backwardness with Clinton and Rice in theirs.
The computer literacy issue is another irrelevancy, albeit one that plays to the sensibilities of nearly everyone in the blogosphere. It's right up there with whether Michelle should wear sleeveless dresses.
The question is whether McCain's advocacy of tax cuts and interventionism and other such policies is well advised. The notion that his ability to refine or effect those policies will be determined in the slightest by whether he can get on line or e-mail strikes me as absurd.
Indeed, as one hits Davos-level elite status, I can see there being an incentive to free one’s self of any tethers to the interwebs, giving off the appearance of not needing to be connected to the web 24/7
That includes Bill Gates, right? He knows how to use a computer. I am sure many CEO's know how to use a Blackberry/iPhone.
I wonder which of them type? Back in the dark ages when I was young, typing was a sex-linked characteristic. I was one of two males in my high school's typing class. In college guys would persuade girlfriends to type papers for them. That might be Clinton, or maybe not--I don't see him as finishing his paper in time to have it typed. McCain I definitely don't see as a typist. And if you don't type, there's problem in adapting to email.
Given that whatever a governmental official puts into writing could potenially be subject to disclosure under an FOIA request (uness, somehow, the writing is classified), it seems enormously prudent for folks like Condi, McCain an Clinton not to own a blackberry.
Also, if somebody is stupid/devious enough to send you something you'd rather have some plausible deniability about in an e-mail, isn't it much smarter to have a well-known inability to read such new-fangled communications?
Deniability is just as precious a commodity as time.
Great. In addition to all the other reasons John McCain should not be President, he's not one of the cool kids.
Email and Blackberry messages are a political liability. How often have members of both political parties had their words taken out of context. Imagine what a treasure trove of information for attack ads email would provide under a Freedom of Information Request.
This doesn't mean that McCain, Rice, & Clinton don't know how to use them, just that they choose not to.
A high-ranking government official, now retired, once told me "never put anything into an e-mail that you wouldn't mind seeing on the front page of tomorrow's Washington Post". Face to face and on the phone this person can be quite verbose, but his e-mails are rare and always quite cryptic.
Staff it. Easy.
I understand Presidents do not use e-mail, even with their own children, for fear of FOIA actions and subpoenas.
"Imagine what a treasure trove of information for attack ads email would provide under a Freedom of Information Request."
Which is why, I suppose, the White House illegally "lost" so many of them.
This is very much like pagers 20yrs ago or cell phones 10yrs ago. They are at first, status symbols, then slowly degrade to chains.
A person without a pager >>> Cell phone>>> Blackberry can say that nothing important happens without him (her) being there.
Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.
Read More
(11)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE