Posted By Daniel W. Drezner Share

Last week was this weblog's sixth anniversary.  A lot has happened during this time -- children being born, children growing up, books being written, tenure being denied, promotions being given, baseball teams shocking the world, me turning forty, audiences waxing and waning, etc.  I was going to write a long, contemplative essay on the significance of blogging for this long and how it's changed me.  This is a blog, however.  So, instead, a few bullet points tapped out while everyone else in the house is sleeping:
  • My fastball ain't what it used to be.  Compared to other bloggers I read, I'm not keeping up the pace and depth of my blog posts (sorry about that --fewer free lunches for you!).  This is for a lot of reasons.  First, a lot of top bloggers are professionals -- i.e., they are paid to blog.  It's just really, really tough to compete as a generalist when the division of labor kicks in.*  Second, I have a lot more day job responsibilities than I did in the past, and I'm very comfortable with putting the blog at the bottom of the list.  Third, my children are walking and talking now, which makes them more interesting (and time-consuming).  And fourth....
  • I've screwed up a lot.  There are some big, big issues that I've gotten wrong in my blogging.  I supported the invasion of Iraq and that hasn't gone so well.  I opposed a surge in Iraq and that has turned out better than I thought.  I've gotten a lot of stuff right too, but in my mind the screw-ups are what stand out.  On the other hand, this has been good, because....
  • I'm a bit better at avoiding some blog traps.  Blogs call for instant analysis, but after six years at this I'm concluding that there are times when it's a virtue to not expressing an immediate opinion.  For example, I'm very glad I was too busy to post about the Russian-Georgian conflict when it first broke out.  Why?  Because the immediate blog debate was over who was to blame for the conflict, which was not terribly interesting.  I thought it distracted many from the "what happens now?" questions that are much more salient.  Posting too early can also cause a blogger to lock in their opinions before enough information is on the table (this, by the way, is why I'm holding off on blogging about the bailout -- I need more information). 
  • The blog has been a godsend to my day job.  I've chronicled why here, but the basic point is that all aspects of my job have been facilitated by maintaining this site. 
  • Thanks for the comments!  For six months the comments feature on this blog was broken.  I quite enjoyed that for the first few weeks -- much less energy devoted to dealing with trolls and spam.  Since the new software has been installed, however, I've been enjoying and learning from the downthread discussions.  So thank you, dear readers, for stopping by -- and for coming back. 
*Also, let's face it, if I have any faith in markets I have to presume that professional bloggers possess a comparative advantage in blogging relative to your humble blogger.   
 

DAVID PINTO

3:10 PM ET

September 21, 2008

Dan, Congratulations on six

Dan,

Congratulations on six years. Keep up the good work!

 

ALEX

3:23 PM ET

September 21, 2008

Many congratulations!

Many congratulations!

 

AGD

3:40 PM ET

September 21, 2008

Congratulations on the

Congratulations on the anniversary!

 

JASON

4:19 PM ET

September 21, 2008

congratulations on the 6

congratulations on the 6 years. i must have begun reading this blog about 5 years ago (unaware you had started it the previous year apparently) and it's been quite good, in fact one of my favorites which is why seeing you post less is somewhat saddening but understandable.

However, the one thing i would like to point out is since becoming tenured there's been a MARKED decline in Selma Hayek references...tsk tsk tsk...for shame young man, for shame.

 

TOM G

7:16 PM ET

September 21, 2008

Congratulations! I passed 4

Congratulations!

I passed 4 years a few months ago at my little nook on the net, and I've been struggling for many of the same reasons you have [particularly #1 and #3]

 

RAJESH

8:36 PM ET

September 21, 2008

Dan, congratulations on your

Dan, congratulations on your blogiversary.
It's obvious to any long term reader that your frequency of posting has declined with time.
I would say however, that your less frequent posts are still valued (at least by me).
Also, you retain the competitive advantage of being an expert on a field who blogs rather than a blogger who is a professional pundit.

 

ZATHRAS

10:21 PM ET

September 21, 2008

Dan deserves congratulations

Dan deserves congratulations for having operated a non-ad sight for six years, and for having maintained a niche in the constantly changing blogosphere.

Over the years I have found him a valuable resource for two reasons. One is his writing on certain economic subjects related to foreign policy, about which he knows much more than most people and certainly more than I do. The other is that Dan is one of the small number of bloggers who has written in a way that resists the pressure within the blogosphere for people to read only bloggers they think will reinforce their views.

This is why Dan's comment section has been -- with allowances for the onslaught of spam that seems to have burdened every blog out there -- a rewarding place in which to think out loud about politcs, economics and government.

 

Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.

Read More