Friday, September 26, 2008 - 9:45 PM
Make no mistake.
Leadership.
Judgement.
Experience.
Character.
The media.
The pundits.
I think the way to do this is to assign a different drink to each of these phrases, maybe taking a double shot if one of the candidates uses the phrase "nay-sayers." This way, tomorrow morning we will feel things are as bad as we think they are tonight.
Is it sad that my friends and I have already been planning such a drinking game via email for most of the day? "Change" is worth a ton of drinks, as is "surge", "Islamic fundamentalism" (double it if we can get an "Islamofascism"), "Reagan," "Kennedy," "Truman," or "Lincoln" (please please please no "Carter"!). Any discussion of America's reputation or credibility in the world demands a full group waterfall until said discussion is over. It may be long, and it may be painful.
I expect, though, above all to hear a lot of "Jim". As in, Jim Lehrer. As in, politicians' annoying habit of continuously repeating the informal version of the journalist's/moderator's name to convey that they, the candidates, are a) personable, b) normal people, and/or c) unusually close friends with your favorite media personalities. Unfortunately, none of these things usually hold true.
Also live-blogging here:
http://tiny.cc/AND75
More! I'm following your live blog, and politico's...
Hmm, McCain can pronounce the unpronounceable names of our allies pretty darn well, does that mean his bungling of our adversaries' unpronounceable names is intentional rather than due to incompetence?
I actually didn't think Obama's segue into oil was very good. Russia's petrodollars are primarily from gas, right? U.S. appetite for oil isn't really the issue...
Nice conclusion, Dan, with tactics vs. strategy. I don't have a clue as to why either (esp McCain) would think this distinction would play anywhere.
Wasn't going to stay up until 3:30am to watch the sucker so I appreciate the comments. Just like being there - and now I can fake that I was with my colleagues!
Are you a member of the Johnny Walker Striding Man Society?
Easy to see the effects of the whiskey as time wore on--more typos, less coherence in the posts. Reminds me of the old radio station drinking effects promos they used to do with the local police departments back in the 70s. We've had "Don't Drink & Drive" forever, then it was "Don't Drink & Dial" (as in ex girl or boyfriends). Now do we have to implement "Don't Drink & Blog?"
I don't care who "won." I spent the evening with friends instead of watching this BS. (Yes, I'm still PO'd that my boy McCranky actually showed. I thought the best way to make his statement was to stay in Washington riding herd on that bunch of miscreants and losers who call themselves the Majority Party.)
Bah! Where's my glass of Jim?
"What does Henry Kissinger really think?"
What was Henry Kissinger really saying? It sounded as if he'd been the one hitting the Johnny Walker.
And he's coaching Palin? Yeah, that'll work . . .
Dan, Dan, drinking a blend? What has the world come to?
McCain is a single malt, Obama not really a whiskey at all. More of a premium vodka kind of guy I'd say.
"I was actually pretty impressed with both of their first responses on Pakistan… until McCain started yammering on about his biography. "
The Walker Blue must have been in full effect if you missed McCain calling Pakistan pre-Musharraf a 'failed state', when in fact it had a democratically elected government that Musharraf toppled in a coup.
Be glad you didn't watch the Red Sox game. Losing to the Yankees 19-8 and all your pitchers look like s--t.
Jon, if I recall the story of the Mushareff 'coup' it was begun by an effort by that "democratic" government to murder Mushareff by deying a plane he was plying on a place to land. He sent orders to an army unit to occupy an airfield and therefore denied the democratic process a chance to work, the dastard!
[...] Drezner live-blogged the debate, making a few insightful comments, then asked a really fascinating question. James Ostrowski [...]
[...] on U.S. foreign policy, that the U.S. should be the prime mover and shaker in the world at large. They differ, and in some ways that are fairly important, on details. But on the central question of whether it [...]
Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.
Read More
(17)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE