Wednesday, February 11, 2009 - 3:46 PM
A lot of bloggers are linking to this Dave Schuler post about how bad things are in East Asia. I certainly don't dispute the facts in the post, but I'm a bit worried about the implicit schadenfreude that's accompanying a lot of the links.
To understand why I'm worried, consider this latest blast of bad economic news from the FT's Geoff Dyer:
Chinese exports dropped 17.5 per cent in January compared with the same month the year before, the biggest decline in more than a decade as the impact on the economy from the global slump gathered pace.
Imports to China declined by a dramatic 43.1 per cent in a further indication of sharply lower demand in the Chinese economy over the last few months which has caused unemployment to soar.
January was the third month in a row that Chinese exports fell although the pace of decline was much faster than the 2.8 per cent drop in December. The decline in imports also accelerated sharply from the 21.3 per cent contraction in December....
With imports falling faster than exports, China recorded another large trade surplus in January of $39.11bn, just below the record of $40.1bn set in November last year.
Everyone will focus on the export number, because that's seen as the important sign of China's economic health. My concern is with the import number. Brad Setser explains:
What worries me the most? The possibility that the sharp y/y fall in imports doesn’t just reflect a fall in imported components or a fall in commodity prices, but rather a major deceleration in China’s domestic economy.
In some sense, it is hard to imagine a worse combination. China’s export are falling, making China understandably reluctant to allow its currency to appreciate. But China’s trade surplus is also rising … certainly in nominal terms and quite possibly in real terms. That isn’t good for the world.
At a time when the world is short demand, China seems to be subtracting from global demand not adding to it. The best solution: an absolutely enormous domestic stimulus in China.
For the global economy to start growing again, China is going to have to be one of the locomotives. But these kind of numbers are going to make it difficult for Beijing to do anything more on its currency or domestic consumption. This inaction is going to depress the export sectors of a lot of economies, and I'm really worried about the political response to that.
Don't see the schadenfreude myself....
The 'Momma knows best' comment might be considered snarky except that it's a wordplay on the last name of the Japanese economist whom was quoted.
The conventional wisdom recently has been that the banking mess in the west has advanced the date of the chinese advance to becoming the world's leading economy. I've been arguing the opposite on the basis of a few fact; No news is decidedly not good news in this context, it means that we don't have the data to know what is happening.
The anecdotal stories coming out of China are decidedly not reassuring, either. Stories of entire factory complexes shuttering overnight and the owners leaving town with months worth of wages and supplier bills never are. It's anecdotal and therefore of limited use, but still.....
The other 'fact' which seems to be true is that in really nasty depressions like this one seems to be, big exporting nations tend to suffer the worst effects because a lot of their employment is sustained by demand in other countries. When that demand contracts, the governments of the markets will take measures to sustain their local employers, sometimes at the expense of the exporters, but even at best will not help the exporters, so the exporters suffer more than usual when demand drops.
The US suffered big time during the 30's. It's my belief (but not hope) that China may suffer badly during the current slump.
Just for the record there's no schadenfreude on my part in the post or, at least, there was none intended.
For my part I'd hate to see the Big 4 Asian economies give up the gains they've made. Economic growth has improved life in Japan, China, South Korea, and Taiwan more than all the development packages ever imagined, making the lives of people in desperate poverty a little less desperate. And we and the Europeans are so interconnected with those economies that we can't help but feel pain if they suffer.
Schadenfreude for all those who say decoupling was a pipe dream.
I think the schadenfreude might be coming from all those folks who never really saw China as the saving grace in the 'decoupling' models. Funny how we haven't seen that word used in a while.
How can you really gloat when the consequences of a serious downturn in China and East Asia are so dire? If there's any gloating, it's on the part of those whose arguments against decoupling are proving to be true.
Yet, wouldn't it be something if the Chinese led us all out of this mess? As an American, I wouldn't mind some Chinese ascendancy right about now, but I wouldn't bet on it.
Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.
Read More
(4)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE