Friday, March 13, 2009 - 2:59 PM
Chinese premier Wen Jiabao, in his annual press conference, fired a verbal shot across the bow of U.S. asset markets:
Speaking at a news conference at the end of the Chinese parliament’s annual session, Mr. Wen said he was “worried” about China’s holdings of Treasury bonds and other debt, and that China was watching United States economic developments closely.
"President Obama and his new government have adopted a series of measures to deal with the financial crisis. We have expectations as to the effects of these measures,” Mr. Wen said. “We have lent a huge amount of money to the U.S. Of course we are concerned about the safety of our assets. To be honest, I am definitely a little worried.”
He called on the United States to “maintain its good credit, to honor its promises and to guarantee the safety of China’s assets.”
When a country that owns $1 trillion of your debt starts making these noises, it's time to fidget a little.
Or is it? I'll have more to say about this later, but for now it's worth pointing out that China's financial leverage over the United States might not be as great as people think. The Wall Street Journal's Andrew Peaple explains why:
Rhetoric aside, it bears repeating that China will find it hard to make a meaningful shift out of Treasurys, the prime current channel for investment of its $1.95 trillion foreign exchange reserves.
Some say China could switch holdings into gold -- but that market's highly volatile, and not large enough to absorb more than a small proportion of China's reserves. It's not clear, meanwhile, that euro, or yen-denominated debt is any safer, more liquid, or profitable than U.S. debt -- key criteria for China's leadership.
Most pertinent of all, even if China decided to sell off some of its U.S. Treasury holdings, it would scarcely be able to dump that in large blocks. And a partial selloff would surely lead to a slump in the Treasury market, eroding the remaining value of China's portfolio.
I find myself wondering why is China owning so much of our debt a secure policy decision? Could not it at sometimes be used as leverage to make policy demands? If not, what inhibits this from happening?
I guess I keep thinking about the first Iraq War. Was not part of the agitation that Kuwait demanded repayment of the monies loaned to Iraq for the Iran War?
I am coming to realize I am the only person with such concerns because the power balance is in our favor. But, when that changes, sooner or later, how will that leave us?
This seems like simply a shot across the bow to Obama's irresponsible spending. If they were actually going to start selling large chunks, they'd do it first before talking about it hit the value of the rest of their holdings.
I'd analogize this to a shareholder jawboning destructive management policies; unlike the current administration, the Chinese understand basic economics, and know that all this added debt is going to eventually hurt our currency and the value of their holdings.
Yes, I'm amazed that Obama was capable of single handedly racking up a ten trillion dollar national debt after being in office for just three months. Well... I suppose Clinton helped.
I mean, everyone knows that when you are in a recession, the government needs to cut spending.
^^
(Going by Blue's comment, I assumed it's opposite day.)
Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.
Read More
(3)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE