Global News : Passport : Ricks : Drezner : Walt : Rothkopf : Lynch
The Cable : The AfPak Blog : Net Effect : Shadow Govt. : Madam Secretary : The Call
This is what happens when financial markets do not read my blog [UPDATED]
Apparently the foreign exchange markets got taken for a ride earlier today in response to Tim Geithner's chat at the Council on Foreign Relations. This makes me wonder if anyone working in forex markets actually listened to the words that came out of Geithner's mouth.
Here's Kathy Lien at FX360 explaining what Geithner said that caused markets to go into a tizzy:
In a blink of an eye, the U.S. dollar has collapsed against the Euro, Japanese Yen and other major currencies. The trigger was comments from Tim Geithner who said that the U.S. is "quite open" to China's suggestion of moving towards a Special Drawing Right (SDR) linked currency system. If the world adopts the SDR, which was created by the IMF as an international reserve asset, it would mean that countries around the world would need to hold less U.S. dollars. (emphasis added)
Except that this is not what Geithner actually said. To be more specific, he did say "quite open," but that's not all he said in his first response. This is from the CFR transcript:
[A]s I understand his proposal, it's a proposal designed to increase the use of the IMF's special drawing rights. And we're actually quite open to that suggestion. But you should think of it as rather evolutionary, building on the current architectures, than -- rather than -- rather than moving us to global monetary union.
Here was my contemporaneous read of what Geithner said:
Geithner is asked about China (not my question) and the IMF's new proposals for expanded lending. He responds by praising Zhou Xiaochuan, China's central bank governor, but claims that he hasn't read his proposal in detail. Geithner makes it clear that he is quite open to expanding the IMF's Special Drawing Rights for less developed countries. Still, he wants it to evolve and be integrated within the current international monetary system -- as opposed to the de novo creation of a new global currency.
I've read the report (Tim, it's not that long, take a look!) and Zhou is not proposing anything so radical so soon, so this is a bit of a red herring. Still, Geithner's statement here carries the same kind of firm pushback that Obama gave yesterday about any move ending the dollar as the global reserve currency.
SDRs are intended for least developed countries, so expanding that program would not profoundly affect the distribution of currency reserves among the world's principal players.
And yet, after Geithner reaffirms this point later in the talk, Lien interprets it as follows:
A few minutes after saying the U.S. is open to an SDR linked currency, Geithner clarified his comments by saying that there is "no change in dollar as world's reserve currency and likely to remain so for long time." In our alert, we said that the dollar would rebound if he attempts to clarify his comments. These contradictory statements are clearly the act of an amateur Treasury Secretary that has been thrust onto the public forum and is struggling with the need to be very particular in his choice of words.
Okaaaaaay..... except there was no contradiction between his statements, and anyone who's been following this stuff for the past week should have understood Geithner's point the first time.
Question to readers: shouldn't the forex markets have interpreted these statements better than your humble blogger? What does this say about the wisdom of crowds?
UPDATE: The Financial Times' Krishna Guha, Tom Braithwaite and Peter Garnham provide more precise reporting on this point:
The dollar fell 1.3 per cent against the euro as headlines saying “Geithner open to SDR currency” flashed across traders’ screens. With the currency falling, Mr Geithner’s interviewer – Roger Altman, a deputy Treasury secretary in the Clinton administration – gave Mr Geithner the chance to clarify.
The Treasury secretary said: “I think the dollar remains the world’s dominant reserve currency.” The dollar subsequently recovered much of its losses.
One fuzzy headline, and you get majoy gyrations in the forex markets.
James Carville once said, "I want to come back as the bond market. You can intimidate everybody." I want to be reincarnated as a headline editor.






I expect mostly they weren't
I expect mostly they weren't interested in what Geithner said, what was important was what he could do.
If he said "I have a secret plan which will make SDRs completely unnecessary for anybody" that might possibly have been reassuring.
If he said "The US military, including our nuclear forces, will do whatever is required to make sure that SDRs do not exist" then that might possibly have been reassuring in some other way.
What else could he have said to reassure people who were concerned about the dollar? What could he do about it? Regardless what he says, what can he do to back up his words? A secret plan. The military. What else?
I heard Kathy Lien is going
I heard Kathy Lien is going to be opening an inspirational training camp for budding amateur treasury secretaries trying to go pro.
I don't know about the
I don't know about the causality, but this morning Politico ran a piece headlined with Geithner being open to the suggestion. I don't know if this was the actual piece that caused the slide, but it may be a case of reporters who generally cover politics interpreting the statements and traders just seeing the headline. The fact that the moderator felt the need to go back to the issue so he could clarify his comments shows that at least some thought his comments could reasonably be interpreted to mean what the press ran with.
Also, there was a further news item today that the head of the IMF said they plan to take up China's proposal within the next few months.
CNBC's Steve Liesman
He is ONE of the real reporters on CNBC and he reported early yesterday that the early news reports were flat wrong. The rest of MSM adds to the problem because they appear only interested in creative journalism. The forex market was reacting to the news reports.
A bit snarky there, Dan?
"Question to readers: shouldn't the forex markets have interpreted these statements better than your humble blogger?"
Trading is a quick-twitch profession. You make money on your intuitions about how other traders will react to news, not on solid analysis. 'Analytical' traders were probably thinking that dollar was set to fall, the only question being when. The headlines gave them the when. If it hadn't been this it would have been something else, probably sooner than later.
"What does this say about the wisdom of crowds?"
Not a lot. The rise of the dollar was a flight to safety, so when the world begins looking safer, the natural response is the dollar is going to fall. It was an event looking for an reason to happen.
I'm getting a sense that market psychology is shifting a little, that the world economy has survived the heart attack it had last fall and now faces other problems like inflation rather than deflation.
Part of it is anecdotal, personal experience. The London IT job market was frozen solid in January, and the salary movements I saw were strongly deflationary, down 15-20% over a year.
Last week I got what has proven to be a solid offer for a slight rise rather than the 20% cut I was braced for. I've seen several other frozen job listings come unfrozen in the past week.
We'll see, I could be wrong. But I'm seeing a few green shoots poking through the tundra. Recessions open new business opportunities as well as killing off weak ventures.