Posted By Daniel W. Drezner Share

This is normally Laura Rozen or David Rothkopf's beat, but I found several interesting reveals in Helene Cooper's New York Times story on how General James L. Jones is working out at national security advisor.  This included a sit-down between Cooper and Jones.

First, there's the dueling moosehead factor.  Rothkopf voices some disapproval of Jones: 

"The national security adviser needs to be behind the president” both literally and figuratively, said David Rothkopf, author of “Running the World: The Inside Story of the National Security Council and the Architects of American Power.” General Jones, Mr. Rothkopf said, is not “seen as the guy in the room.”

On the other hand, Brent Scowcroft also gets quoted:  “I look at the result of our national security policy and I’m pretty pleased so far.”

Second, although Cooper doesn't come out and say it bluntly, the NSC staff seems dissatisfied with Jones' lack of workplace intensity, which leads to this priceless exchange:

General Jones described that behind-the-scenes “teeing up” process as an example of how he could be helpful to the president. He maintained his cool even when asked about sniping from staff members that he went biking at lunchtime and left work early, although he did, at one point, seem about to crush his coffee cup.

“I’m here by 7 o’ clock in the morning, and I go home at 7, 7:30 at night; that’s a fairly reasonable day if you’re properly organized,” he said. What about officials who pride themselves on being at the White House deep into the night?

“Congratulations,” he said. “To me that means you’re not organized.”  (emphasis added)

Despite the obnoxiousness of the last remark, I have to side with Jones here.  The perception -- aided and abetted by The West Wing -- is that unless you're staying at your White House office until the early hours of the morning, you're not really working that hard.  That is a massive deterrent for aspiring policymakers with concurrent aspirations of a home life from entering government service. 

Still, what's truly interesting here is that Cooper is picking up this kind of backbiting from the NSC staff.

Developing...

 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

BRETT

6:22 PM ET

May 7, 2009

Indeed. We need to bring back

Indeed. We need to bring back the old trend of actually getting off work at a reasonable hour. George Marshall did it - he'd leave office at 5 PM, every day, during World War 2.

 

SIGIVALD

7:02 PM ET

May 7, 2009

I like the idea that Very

I like the idea that Very Important Policy People actually take time to rest and do other things.

Unless they're superhuman (which evidence suggests they aren't, in almost all cases), that can only lead to bad decisions and pointless stress. It may well be justified during an immense crisis, at least for some actors - but as a general policy at all times, it's madness, and useless posturing.

I'd respect a President who worked a strict 9-to-5 (plus required "entertaining" as needed) more, as both sensible and aware that his job is not (normally, again outside of some immense crisis ala Cuban, Missile) vital in a way that requires him to be Always On The Job.

 

DAVECHENEY

12:33 PM ET

May 8, 2009

Not sure why it is "Obnoxious"

I agree with General Jones that time management and organization are key to doing a difficult job well and not killing yourself. I have watched many people cram 2-3 hours of work into a 12-15 hour day due to an inability to focus. Working late and long is required during a crisis, but Jones seems to beleive, as I do, that if everything is a crisis, nothing is. The work will be there tomorrow.

 

APPALLED MODERATE

1:31 PM ET

May 8, 2009

Beware of the Drama Queen Workaholic

People who think it is very important to be seen working late are those who hoard projects, refuse to delegate, get into trouble and not tell their colleagues, and believe in expanding their sphere of infunece everywhere. In other words, these are precisely the people who work to expand government, spend more money, and manufacture crisises in which they are the star.

Just what I want at the NSA.

People with a balanced life make better decisions.

 

Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.

Read More