Dumbest... remake... well, not ever, but since the beginning of this decade

Wed, 08/12/2009 - 11:01am

Children of the 1980's have suffered a series of body blows this summer -- the death of Michael Jackson, the death of John Hughes, etc.  Well, now it appears we will have to suffer another indignity.  MGM recently announced that they remaking Red Dawn (this week they announced their casting choices), a staple of basic cable outlets for twenty years -- and one of the most unintentionally campy movies ever made. 

For the uninitiated, the movie depicts a Russian/Cuban/Nicaraguan invasion of the United States, and the fierce resistance put up by a band of high schoolers.  As one of FP's movie geeks, I love this movie almost as much as I love Starship Troopers.  Harry Dean Stanton shouting "Avenge me!!"; Lea Thompson and C. Thomas Howell acting all tough;  Patrick Swayze shouting "because we live here!" as the justification for killing Russians; Powers Boothe's scenery-chewing; the Cuban occupiers subduing the population by accessing gun registration forms -- it's all good.  Wolverines!!!!!

Now, this movie -- the first one rated PG-13, by the way -- was pretty absurd even by Reagan-era standards.  Which brings one to an interesting question -- why remake it now? The commissioned screenwriter has provided the following justification:

Similar to the way the original played off Cold War fears in the 1980s, [writer Carl] Ellsworth says the remake will play off of current fears related to post-9/11 terrorism. ''As Red Dawn scared the heck out of people in 1984, we feel that the world is kind of already filled with a lot of paranoia and unease, so why not scare the hell out of people again?''

Well, sure, except that this makes no f***ing sense.  Post-9/11 terror scares Americans because of the prospect that an attack could take place at any moment.  The one thing actors like Al Qaeda can't do terribly well is secure and hold territory -- which is exactly what the Russians were ostensibly trying to do in Red Dawn.  I fact, in the original movie, it's the Wolverines who act a bit like terrorists, bombing Russian installations and such.  So I can't see how Red Dawn is a usable template for talking about post-9/11 terrorism concerns. 

This isn't as bad an idea as remaking Hogan's Heroes -- but it's pretty close. 

( filed under: )


Advertisement

 

I can see it.Chinese troops

I can see it.

Chinese troops manning checkpoints. They shoot up a station wagon with a mother and her three kids coming home from soccer practice. A sullen crowd forms. A chinese soldier who knows english takes the megaphone. "They did not stop. Against the raw. You must stop at checkpoints. Rook at the sign!" He points to a small cardboard sign that has some chinese characters on it.

Americans with a variety of hunting rifles etc ambush a chinese patrol on a city street. The chinese open fire at everybody -- shoppers, seniors in jogging suits, they systematically shoot grenades into every window. The american fighters mostly get away but the chinese keep shooting. "Man, those guys are crazy!" They watch from a distance as the chinese planes do airstrikes on the city block where the attack happened. "Oh god, what do we do now?"

The americans find out about an unarmed russian group that is taking the first steps toward setting up socialised medicine. They argue whether to kill them. "We can't do that! They're civilians! It would be a war crime!" "What the hell have you been smoking?"

The hero has an argument with a liberal.
"Hey, things aren't so bad. They're going to have elections!"
"Why do you care which communist wins the election?"
"If you want to run, just tell them you're a communist and they'll let you."
"What the hell."
"Look, stop and think. Are you better off now? In the bad old days 40% of the population couldn't afford health insurance."
"I don't know what you've been smoking, but I'm not going to stop killing communists until they're all dead."
"Man, you're a terrorist. Unless you get with the program I'm going to have to report you to the police."

The hero kills the liberal -- cuts his head clean off with a big knife -- while the TV runs an announcement that says american-on-american violence is up 3% this month, and the threat from terrorists and Anti-American-Agents (AAAs) is increasing. The US government will enlist more people into the American Defense Force and pays recruits $15,000/month.

US insurgents who have jobs as baggage handlers at the airport have created a plan. They will sneak aboard a collection of civilian aircraft and then take over the controls and ram into a collection of buildings used by the invaders, both military and civilian buildings. They will die gloriously, striking a blow for freedom! The girl kisses the second hero and cries over his sacrifice, and he delivers a noble speech about how we all have to do whatever it takes to preserve the american way of life.

And the plan succeeds! They strike the Pentagon, the IRS headquarters, Yankee Stadium where the foreign soldiers are massed watching a foreign comedian, a nuclear power plant, etc. The survivors cry and cheer and plan for the next attack. They agree to do whatever it takes, and in their secret headquarters they salute an old torn US flag. Then the soulful music plays while the credits run and the audience walks out feeling patriotic.

I love it.

lol

Sans the direct reference to 9/11, say, if it was a bunch of trains filled with explosives, driven into the white house and capitol hill, a la V for Vendetta, it's a scarily plausible film.

I recently discovered that in America there is a series of blockbuster films called "Axis of Evil", I think there's at least three. What surprised me most is that these films are utterly not seen outside of the US, in Europe, Japan, Hong Kong, or the UK. They're literally made for American nutjobs.

God help your people.

I'd never heard of this

I'd never heard of this series, so I looked it up on IMDB. You appear to be thinking of "Behind Enemy Lines". The first installment was a moderately successful Hollywood production, briefly #1 in Australia but never in the US. It was followed by two unrelated direct-to-video releases. According to the plot summaries, the only threat to the US in three movies was one North Korean ICBM.

If you still want to claim that these movies say something significant about Americans, consider the greater success of "Kurtlar Vadisi Irak" ad "Metal Firtina".

Hey, I'd buy a ticket.

Oh, wait. I did.

You do have a point.

The GWOT does look quite different from the inside -- at least if you leave out the point that al-Qaida tears out eyeballs in interrogations. But then, Hollywood has a long history of doing that kind of thing (whitewashing its heroes, not tearing out eyeballs); I agree, though, just leave out the explicit suicide attacks, and you've practically got _Star Wars_. (And if you read between the lines, you start to catch on that, within the fictional setting, the Rebel Alliance was a little less holy -- and less of a scratch company of principled freedom fighters -- than they'd like you to believe.)

Remember this for the future, of course; don't automatically assume that whoever's the underdog is the hero...

IED

One interesting thing about Red Dawn is its use of an "Improvised Explosive Device," when one of the guys (I forget which one) places an explosive under the head of his dying girlfriend (Lea Thompson, I think), set to go off when one of the Russkies discover her body.

It's interesting that as a red-meat patriotic movie, this scene implicitly claims that such tactics are justified when one's country is under attack. I suspect that most movie viewers cheer on the vigorous defense of the USA championed in the film; but that few of them recognize that our own 'enemies' see their attacks on US soldiers in much the same way.

It's simple: crazy-scary

It's simple: crazy-scary terrorists take over High-School in flyover country and hold hostages. Rag tag group of patriotic teenagers kill terrorists. Much flag waving, one-liners, and dead terrorists. I'd see that.

IED clarification

abrotherk - She asked for the boyfriend to pull the pin on a grenade that she held in her hand. Then, when the Russian troops rolled her over, it fell out and went 'boom'.

J Thomas, the only problem with your screenplay is that you lose the lines of dialogue from the original movie

"...So who's on our side?"
"600 million screamin Chinamen"
"Last I heard, there were a billion screaming Chinamen.
"
"There *were*."

Have to agree though, this is about as dumb a remake as one can make.

IEDs and booby traps are not the same thing

abrotherk,

You are confusing IEDs and booby traps. In the movie, that was a grenade that he gave to her. It functioned the way it was intended, so there was no IED element to it. He basically booby-trapped her body...something done quite frequently by guerillas in Vietnam.

cool_cons,

What would terrorists have to gain by capturing a high school in same podunk Midwest town? Hell, some places would let them have it.....

Already been done...

as reality TV. Did you miss

'Green Dawn', staged in Anbar. More dangerous than X-Games. Smash hit on the international arabic networks, where for some odd reason the audiences identified with the people that dressed like them.
or
'Usama's Heroes', th niche market cult classic staged at Camp Cropper? Boy, you really didn't want to get voted off that one!

The episode where the Pakistani double-dealer sold Big Brother the wrong prisoners, and got immunity too, was hilarious. The water-wipeout excerpts went viral, got hundreds of hits in the hideaway VP mansion. (I hear there is an Iranian spin-off now.)

Who can forget the memorable redux of "I see naaaawthing!!!''

There's irony that unflagging Red State support for Team Bush's disastrous occupation and interrogation policies is regionally coincident with the resistance heroes of the War of Northern Aggression. But not as much irony as the '24' production unit 'going green'.

Reuters says China will be the enemy

Which is a rather interesting commercial judgment by the producers:

http://www.lowyinterpreter.org/post/2009/08/14/Another-Red-Dawn.aspx

The funny thing about 'Yellow Dawn'

is that the USN has gone so far into debt with 'Formosa 2020' development costs and pre-production delays that the Chinese exec. producers will own the rights by the time it's ready for shooting.

The accountants really run the biz. War is an industry that just happens to be an art form.

The 80s Movie that SHOULD be remade is . . .

You should all be ashamed of either your lack of 80s movie awareness or your lack of creativity.

The jingoistic 80s movie that could, nay, SHOULD be remade is "Invasion America," the Chuck Norris vehicle in which a terrorist army invades America through South Florida and conducts random, DC-sniper/Mumbai like attacks throughout the Southeast until Chuck lures them into a trap and gives them what they have coming.

(What exactly the terrorists' grievances are, or why they are unable to take a shower during their entire time in America is never explained).

This plot, sadly, is relatively plausible, and Norris could make an appearance either recreating Lee Marvin's role in "Delta Force" (because there are numerous senior citizens in Delta), or better, as President!

Now THAT would be some great camp updated for the post-9/11 generation.

The remakes of historical significance are...

3 versions of King Kong. Two of them featuring the WTC. The original was probably the single most watched movie in the moslem world, until the Beverly Hillbillies updated Fay Wray's evil seduction of the righteous Kong with Ellie May's wanton sexuality.

Talk about underdag over-identification. Tell me the rage of the video Kongs didn't scream for release back onto the big screen, when the Beruit transit barracks went down.

Joseph Campbell would understand.

The actual title is...

I Stand Corrected and Ashamed

You are absolutely correct.

And given that I chastised everybody else (tongue firmly in cheek, of course) for insufficient 80's movie trivia expertise, I will now go sit in a corner and hang my head in shame.

(The rest of my points regarding the similarity of the attacks in INVASION USA and the Mumbai attacks remains valid, however).

I have heard that it might

I have heard that it might feature the Chinese instead of the Russians, not that this makes it any better. To be honest I generally despise this type of movie based on the plot alone, they're generally too black and white to justify as anything except for a patriotic money making venture.

Springfield USA

Only slightly related, but does anyone remember a 1950s radio show called "Springfield USA?" I listened to it on radio on the Armed Forces Network in Germany in the late 50s and early 60s. It posited a Russian takeover (I missed how this was accomplished) of the US and the establishment of parallel institutions (Young Pioneers as the alternative to Boy/Girl Scouts, for instance). Resistance was difficult, but applauded, naturally, in the scripts.

Yeah, they're Chinese

Is it really a good idea to insult one's bankers?

Not really

No, but that had only a minor ability to protect the Jews for centuries.