Posted By Daniel W. Drezner Share

For reasons that will soon become clear, your humble blogger has been reading up on Iceland's financial boom and bust in recent years.  So I noted with interest that yesterday, Iceland's Prime Minister Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir took to the pages of the Financial Times to vent about her country's treatment at the hand of big countries... like the Netherlands.  See if you can spot the contradiction in her statements:

In its efforts to conclude negotiations over compensation for foreign savers in failed banks, Iceland has been accused of a tendency to imagine a British or Dutch conspiracy behind any bad news.

Iceland has no such tendency. It is battling the effects of severe banking and currency crises and a recession that is affecting our part of the world as much as any other. My government, which took over in February and gained a majority in general elections in May, has to deal with the aftermath of the fall of nearly all of Iceland’s privatised banking sector....

The FT has reported how the Dutch opposed the IMF lending to Iceland in order to enforce their demands on Icesave [an online bank headquartered in Iceland that attracted upwards of 300,000 British and Dutch depositors--DD], claiming the UK and Germany as allies. The perception is that Treasury officials in the UK and the Netherlands used their bargaining power against a much weaker party when the Icesave deal, now being debated in the Icelandic parliament, was struck.

This has made it difficult for Iceland’s government to convince the parliament and Icelanders that an agreement on Icesave accounts with the UK and the Netherlands is un-avoidable.

Here's the funny thing -- if you click on the link from the FT about how the Dutch are using the IMF to put the screws on Iceland, you get this story which sources those suspicions to.... Icelandic officials.  The story also goes on to say that, "The view in London is that Iceland has a tendency to imagine a British or Dutch conspiracy behind any bad news." 

To be fair to Sigurðardóttir, she wasn't in power when Iceland got itself into this mess.  Furthermore, Iceland did have help getting into this mess -- reading up, it's clear that EU banking regulations are even more screwed-up than US banking regulations.  And it wouldn't stun me if the Dutch were putting the screws on Iceland. 

Still, reading up on the mess in Reykjavik, it is truly stunning how little Icelanders seem to blame themselves for their current plight (and how much they thought their run of success was completely deserved).  The fault always seems to lie with cabals of hedge funds, rating agencies, foreign central bankers, etc. 

Iceland has had its share of bad luck, and until recently had a political class that was by far the most incompetent in the OECD area (and the competition in this arena is admittedly intense).  Still, reading Sigurðardóttir's op-ed, I can see why Henry Kissinger once described Iceland as the most arrogant small country he had ever encountered. 

 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

BLUE13326

9:22 PM ET

August 15, 2009

To be fair, if the Brits used

To be fair, if the Brits used anti-terror laws to freeze your accounts, you'd probably think they didn't necessarily have your best interests at heart, either.

 

DON S

10:24 PM ET

August 15, 2009

To be fair?

To be fair, if another country took in several billion £ of your savings 'guaranteed', used the proceeds to buy up retail chains in your country, then proposes to sell those assets and renig on guarantees to your savers, you might invoke anything you possibly could to stop them from selling the asets off and leaving you with nothing - while they compensate their own nationals with your money.

I kind of feel for the new government. But it was they who did the borrowing, and they who can't possibly pay their debts. The UK government basically did the same thing as the Icelanders did; tried to make their own whole at the expense of the other. In another sense they seized collaterall for non-payment of debt, before it could be fraudulently sold off.

 

BLUE13326

6:06 PM ET

August 16, 2009

If you designate me the same

If you designate me the same as al-Queda, no matter how justified you may think this to be, I'm going to believe you don't like me, at minimum. I might even think you were behind a conspiracy against me. And I wouldn't think this to be an irrational assessment.

 

DON S

11:14 PM ET

August 16, 2009

Designations.....

If you designate me the same as a certain Austrian paperhanger, or even hint that you may believe that there might be certain similarities, I might swiftly come to believe that you (and most of your countrymen) do not like me. Particularly if they don't quickly whack you one and even act a little like they might even agree....

And yet this is done with boring frequency.

I believe the Brown government slapped on the order in response to an idea floated by Iceland's then-government that Icelandic deposit insurance was for Icelanders first and only auslanders later, assuming anything was left. Given that Iceland had taken over the big banks, which owned large retain chains in the UK, and that Iceland's banks had several billions of £ in nominally 'insured' deposits which they were proposing to treat in a casual manner, I think Gordon Brown was obliged to act. Nobody really believes Iceland = Al Queda. The true 'hurt feelings' come from the fact that the UK didn't allow Iceland to pay their own people while leaving the UK depositors in the lurch.

I confess to an interest in this. I live in the UK, and the idiots who run my local council deposited £20 million of taxpayers money with Kaupthing. We might get a fraction back because of Gordon Brown's action. And hurt feelings be damned.

 

WILLHSMIT

10:07 PM ET

August 15, 2009

disaster overrated?

Is the crisis in Iceland as bad as it's portrayed? Every GDP forecast I see is a little higher than the last one, and at this point the numbers look similar to Germany and Japan and much better than Ireland or the Baltics...

 

DON S

10:33 PM ET

August 15, 2009

Perhaps that is part of the

Perhaps that is part of the conspiracy against Iceland? Iceland isn't actually incredibly underwater, Range Rovers aren't becoming carbeques, and the Icelanders remain the world's richest and smartest people?

Those forecasts couldn't possibly be - made up? Could they?

 

JAYESLOS

3:13 PM ET

August 16, 2009

Icelandic names

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icelandic_name#Cultural_ramifications_-_how_to_address_people

 

Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.

Read More