Global News : Passport : Ricks : Drezner : Walt : Rothkopf : Lynch
The Cable : The AfPak Blog : Net Effect : Shadow Govt. : Madam Secretary : The Call
China's future
My latest column for Newsweek International is now available. It looks at optimistic and pessimistic modes of thought with regard to China's future, and suggests that they can both be right:
I belong to the third camp—the one that believes that the Bubblers and the Extrapolators can both be right. My camp looks at China and sees the parallels with America's rise to global economic greatness during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. From an outsider's vantage point, America looked like a machine that could take immigrants and raw materials and spit out manufactured goods at will. By 1890, the U.S. economy was the largest and most productive in the world. As any student of American history knows, however, these were hardly tranquil times for the United States. Immigration begat ethnic tensions in urban areas. The shift from an agrarian to an industrial economy led to fierce and occasionally violent battles between laborers, farmers, and owners of capital. With an immature financial sector, recession and depressions racked the American economy for decades.
It is not contradictory for China to amass a larger share of wealth and power while still suffering from severe domestic vulnerabilities. From the perspective of the rest of the world, however, this is not a good thing.
As for why it's not a good thing, well, you'll have to read the whole article.






Fragile Superpower
If you want a more fleshed out version of Prof. Drezner's argument, I highly recommend Fragile Superpower by Susan Shirk. A great book on China by a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for China.
How much can we trust those
How much can we trust those Chinese growth statistics? It's not as if they're entirely accountable on the sources, and the local officials have strong incentives to exaggerate.
the key question is not about
the key question is not about the consequences accompanying change in general but rather the culture within which the change occurs and the consequences of that - in this sense the similarities between China and 19th century America as economic behemoths are largely tangential I think.
China
It's an interesting marriage. Communist China and capitalism. Economically, the Chinese are on a roll. Politically, it's still a controlled environment. I do not know how these two conditions can coexist but I guess we will find out over time. There are rumblings in China about freedom for the citizens. How do stop the Internet from ultimately getting information to the people of China? casino en ligne
You’re right in your third
You’re right in your third camp approach. It’s just too bad this column wasn’t written a few years ago.
You conclude with, “Eventually the United States took a more active interest in world affairs—but the 50 years it took for Washington's reach to match its power were rocky ones for the rest of the globe. Let's hope that the global political economy does not suffer from a case of déjà vu.”
Didn’t the global political economy just suffer a case of déjà vu? If China had a more active interest in world affairs it would have done more to address the massive global financial imbalances. Or maybe (Of course) China is pursing its interests, and they are different than ours.
Be it the US after WWII or China today, a global crisis isn't as bad as it sounds when you're the only one left standing.