Posted By Daniel W. Drezner Share

Following up on my dollar post from earlier this week, I see that Paul Krugman is talking a related issue in his New York Times column today -- the refusal of the renminbi to depreciate against the dollar:

Many economists, myself included, believe that China’s asset-buying spree helped inflate the housing bubble, setting the stage for the global financial crisis. But China’s insistence on keeping the yuan/dollar rate fixed, even when the dollar declines, may be doing even more harm now.

Although there has been a lot of doomsaying about the falling dollar, that decline is actually both natural and desirable. America needs a weaker dollar to help reduce its trade deficit, and it’s getting that weaker dollar as nervous investors, who flocked into the presumed safety of U.S. debt at the peak of the crisis, have started putting their money to work elsewhere.

But China has been keeping its currency pegged to the dollar — which means that a country with a huge trade surplus and a rapidly recovering economy, a country whose currency should be rising in value, is in effect engineering a large devaluation instead.

Krugman then goes on to excoriate the U.S. Treasury department for not upbraiding the Chinese more on this. 

Fair enough, but the thing is, the United States is not the country that's hurt the most by this tactic.  It's the rest of the world -- particularly Europe and the Pacific Rim -- that are getting royally screwed by China's policy.  These countries are seeing their currencies appreciating against both the dollar and the renminbi, which means their products are less competitive in the U.S. market compared to domestic production and Chinese exports

This leads to the title of this post.  Krugman presumes that the U.S. has the strongest incentive to talk to China about this issue.  If one thinks of the U.S. acting as the hegemon, that's possibly true.  As a matter of direct economic interest, however, why haven't the Europeans and East Asians been screaming bloody murder about this?  China's policies are forcing them to take actions they don't want to take -- so why aren't they complaining more loudly about this? 

Why? 

 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

BRETT

3:38 PM ET

October 23, 2009

China's policies are forcing

China's policies are forcing them to take actions they don't want to take -- so why aren't they complaining more loudly about this?

Why?

How good is Chinese market penetration into European and other East Asian economies? I can see two niggling factors here as to why the dog might not be barking:

1. Perhaps it hasn't really affected them at home yet. From what I've read, the Chinese have had significant difficulty in terms of market penetration with regards to Europe, and they run trade deficits with most of their East Asian neighbors.

2. Different types of exports. Perhaps the Chinese and the Europeans export different types of goods to the US, so that a rise in Chinese export competitiveness due to their currency status hasn't really affected their export revenues.

 

BLUE13326

5:26 AM ET

October 24, 2009

Several reasons: European

Several reasons: European elites truly do believe that China is either going to be the next hegemon or at least the true counterbalance to the US in a bi-polar world; and, unlike with the US, there can be real consequences in pissing off an authoritarian hegemon (and one that has some historical grievances). Even Obama has the same tendency, witness his refusing to meet the Dalai Lama.

European elites also truly do believe that penetrating the vast and upwardly mobile Chinese market will be the holy grail of their economic growth for the next 50 years. Just like when US businesses said nothing when China ripped off patent after patent because they wanted access to the Chinese market, they are making the bet that remaining silent while getting ripped off now will pay dividends later. And so are we.

 

BURNINGCHROME

4:29 AM ET

October 26, 2009

US is a consumer nation

US is a consumer nation buying far more than producing. A devaluation of the dollar may increase some exports, but it won't have much impact on imports as there is no longer a local alternative so the balance of payments just gets worse with the US paying out increasingly more and more for overseas produced goods. At the end of the day this drives up the US deficit which in turn weakens the dollar.....

 

DANIEL W. DREZNER

12:50 PM ET

October 26, 2009

You're saying consumers won't react to prices?

Why would higher import prices not affect consumer demand for them?

 

Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.

Read More