Saturday, July 24, 2010 - 2:29 AM
In a funny blog post, Reason's Jesse Kline riffs on the rising number of Jedi knights in Canada, but concludes with the following assessment of the Jedi contribution to liberty:
Although the Jedis did assist the Rebel Alliance in overthrowing a tyrannical emperor, it's clear that the Knights were originally setup to enforce the Galactic Senate's big government agenda.
I must say, I find Jesse's lack of faith disturbing. Based on the Star Wars films, we know very little about the Galactic Senate's pre-Phantom Menace agenda, but we do know that Chancellor Valorum is a pretty weak leader. We also know Palpatine's designs. Upon becoming chancellor, he vows to put down the separatists, raises a Grand Army of the Republic, stays in power well beyond the expected number of years/terms, and finally reorganizes the Republic into the First Galactic Empire. That's as big of a big government agenda as you're going to get.
Are the Jedi big government advocates? That's unclear. I think it would be more accurate to describe them as cartelistic -- they refuse to permit a free market in learning the ways of the Force. After all, the Jedi Council's initial inclination is not to train Anakin Skywalker despite his obvious talents, using some BS about fear as a cover. Only when Qui-Gon threatens to go rogue do they relent. The Council does not inform the Senate that their ability to detect the force has been compromised. They're reluctant to expand their assigned tasks -- they're keepers of the peace, not soldiers. Just as clearly, their anti-competitive policies weakened their own productivity, given the fact that they were unable to detect a Sith Lord walking around right under their noses for over a decade.
So, were the Jedi perfect agents of liberty? No, probably not. But neither were they handmaidens to the greatest concentration of state power in galactic history.
P.S. Beyond George Lucas' rather bigoted portrayal of anything involving commerce, another source of libertarian resentment against the Jedi might be their lack of respect for property rights. If the Force is an energy field created by all living things, then why the hell to the Jedi get to exploit it without compensating the creatures who create it in the first place? If you think about the Jedi as the Guardians of the Republic, this might sound absurd. Replace "Guardians of the Republic" with "rapacious strip-miners of primordial energy," however, and suddenly they don't look so good. At least the Sith stay small in number, so the externality problem is kept to a minimum.
"Cartel"? It's not like the Jedi were selling Jedi training courses or they kept any royalties for this.
Unlike, of course, the Harper Government itself.... I just wish the cabinet wasn't filled with Jar Jar Binks clones.
They're reluctant to expand their assigned tasks -- they're keepers of the peace, not soldiers.
You sure about that? They seemed to leap into the Clones Wars fast enough, and often fought on the front lines.
In fact, I think that was the Jedi Order's problem - that they did leap into the Clone Wars. They got so obsessed with "winning the war" that they failed to notice that the political ground was shifting beneath their feet, and by the time they finally realized it in Revenge of the Sith, it was too late - Palpatine had already more or less become a dictator for life.
Just as clearly, their anti-competitive policies weakened their own productivity, given the fact that they were unable to detect a Sith Lord walking around right under their noses for over a decade.
Keep in mind that for most of that time, they weren't actively searching for one. But even when they began doing so, what makes you think they can detect fellow Force-users without forcing them to openly use the Force*?
There seems to be this idea that Jedi and Sith (among other Force-users) emit some type of "Force field" (pun not intended, but it works) that should alert other Force-users to their presence. That doesn't match the on-screen evidence - Qui-Gon, for example, didn't know that Anakin was strong in the Force until he did the midichlorian test, and Palpatine/Sidious was unable to detect Luke Skywalker on the stolen Imperial shuttle in Return of the Jedi.
* Err, sorry about that alliteration.
Beyond George Lucas' rather bigoted portrayal of anything involving commerce,
I don't think the portrayal is that bad. The Trade Federation, among others, were the main forces behind the Secessionist movement, but as the opening to The Phantom Menace explained, they had some real grievances (namely, "the taxation of trade routes").
They can detect force adepts and others whoa are skilled at using it. In episode four, Vader is able to detect the presence of Obi wan while he's walking around the Death Star, and eventually finds him (that thing was the size of a small planet mind you). He can also tell that the "force is strong" with a certain rebel pilot in the middle of a space battle at a time in galactic history where there are no Jedi. As far as not looking for the Sith Lord, Yoda states in episode one that Sith always travel in pairs, which means they certainly had to be looking for Darth Maul's other number (and that's without even going into the Sith's goings on during the clone wars). BTW, the emperor almost certainly knew of Luke's presence on Endor, and was actively trying to trap him as well as the rest of the rebel fleet (those poor Bothans were used!).
Inconsistencies in the story? Maybe. However your analysis that they got so obsessed with winning the Clone War (mission creep) that they couldn't see the political ground shifting is spot on. They most certainly were soldiers, probably more like templars or religious order medieval knights than paid contractors. That this role superseded all other ones, and the fact that most Jedi had never even seen a Sith, much less fought one, speaks to an atrophying ability to be able to do ones own job. Cartelistic? I would say their original job was to maintain (pseudo) religious orthodoxy in the use of the Force. The fact that they had to be skilled warriors in able to do this lead to them expanding their purview to the point that they no longer had the numbers or ability to accomplish their objectives.
Big Government advocates. Meh. They clearly took advantage of the unity and structure the Republic provided, but that doesn't point to promoting Federalism. However if a planet were to encourage people to use the force outside of Jedi orthodoxy, its certain they would have tried to leverage the power of the Republic to stop it.
If I remember correctly, the Death Star was the size of a small moon, not planet. (total nitpick, I know). Obi-Wan: That's no moon. It's a space station
.
.
One thing to add, and I'm not sure if this crosses lines of orthodoxy, but I remember in the subsequent Star Wars novels (post ROTJ), on one planet, the natives demanded that Luke adjudicate a conflict between two neighbors (I believe that one patron was demanding "Jedi Justice").
.
Obi-Wan: For over a thousand generations, the Jedi knights were the guardians of peace and justice in the old Republic... before the dark times... before the empire.
.
.
Yeah, I thought about that as I typed it. But I thought a moon was generally defined as a natural formation larger than an asteroid in orbit around a larger planet. Thus a planet can be a moon and vice verse, as long as one is orbiting something larger. That place with the Ewoks was a moon.
But you're totally right, as you pulled out the Kenobi quote. I'm pwned.
BTW: "Guardians of the old republic." Thinking about it, I know think that they only 'guarded' the Republic as long as it would help maintain the Jedi monopoly on the use of the force. They really didn't seem to care about the political landscape, and the Galactic Empire was only a threat to them when it turned out that a Sith was in charge which meant their hegemony (and existence) was threatened. (I'm only really familiar with the movies, all the novels and other canon are unknown to me).
Thoughts?
They can detect force adepts and others whoa are skilled at using it. In episode four, Vader is able to detect the presence of Obi wan while he's walking around the Death Star, and eventually finds him (that thing was the size of a small planet mind you).
He had a pretty strong personal connection with Obi-Wan, or at least he did before Mustafar. It's kind of like how Vader was able to sense Luke's presence on the shuttle whereas Palpatine couldn't.
He can also tell that the "force is strong" with a certain rebel pilot in the middle of a space battle at a time in galactic history where there are no Jedi.
That sounds more like a general saying, like "May the Force be with you" and so forth.
As far as not looking for the Sith Lord, Yoda states in episode one that Sith always travel in pairs, which means they certainly had to be looking for Darth Maul's other number (and that's without even going into the Sith's goings on during the clone wars).
They had no idea, though, that it was Palpatine. You could possibly chalk that one up to Jedi arrogance - they didn't even think that the Sith Lord might be right under their nose until it was too late.
BTW, the emperor almost certainly knew of Luke's presence on Endor, and was actively trying to trap him as well as the rest of the rebel fleet (those poor Bothans were used!).
Inconsistencies in the story? Maybe.
Palpatine actually didn't know that Luke was with the rebel group on the shuttle until Vader told him. Remember when Vader tells him that he sensed him, and Palpatine's response is something like "Strange that I did not"?
However your analysis that they got so obsessed
with winning the Clone War (mission creep) that they couldn't see the political ground shifting is spot on. They most certainly were soldiers, probably more like templars or religious order medieval knights than paid contractors.
That's certainly what they became - soldiers.
It's one of the things I really like about the prequels - the way that the Jedi Order falls into destruction. The novelization put it best when it said that the Clone Wars were always the "revenge of the Sith".
While the Jedi were a supernatural force used administratively to balance against the threat of the dark side, they also were used as leverage and posturing in non-Dark Side issues. Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan are sent to negotiate a Trade Federation/Naboo settlement re: the blockade. Granted, it turns out to be a sham, but that is still their assignment nonetheless.
In regards to the exclusivity of the force...meh. It makes sense. They're kind of like the IAEA of the force-a group of individual agents who pursue affiliated goals while trying to keep control over strategic advantage with the facade of "safety." Though I can't imagine that every schmuck in Coruscant being able to shoot lightning out of their fingertips and throw garbage cans through business fronts with their minds would be a good situation.
Awesome post and comments. TS Elliott once said 'man cannot face too much reality', but what he should have added was '...especially if he can spend his time thinking about Star Wars novels instead.'
What I really want to know is why Lucas decided to call his first movie Star Wars, when it plainly involves multiple star systems and only one war. Also, if The Force is an energy field surrounding all living things, shouldn't it be a lot more powerful in the middle of cities than it is in the interstellar void?
Finally, that Mace Windu guy was clearly a doofus. I mean, he was about as perceptive as a lamp post through the whole second trilogy, and got himself killed because wanted to make a speech after putting that Sith guy flat on his back. How did he get into the order in the first place? Did his interview end with Yoda saying, "the Force is strong with you, so even though you are doofus material you are in the club"? Did he later star in Jedi recruiting commercials saying, "The Force can have a strong influence on the weak-minded. Just look what it did for me!"
I just don't think a superhero should be a doofus. Think of every doofus you've ever known -- would you really give them superpowers if you had a choice?
"I think it would be more accurate to describe them as cartelistic -- they refuse to permit a free market in learning the ways of the Force. After all, the Jedi Council's initial inclination is not to train Anakin Skywalker despite his obvious talents, using some BS about fear as a cover. Only when Qui-Gon threatens to go rogue do they relent."
I think your description is quite accurate, although I'd point out that their initial decision to not train Anakin was right on the money, even if it was motivated by elitism and secrecy.
Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.
Read More
(11)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE