Tuesday, August 10, 2010 - 12:28 PM
It is now standard operating procedure for commentators to observe how large the gulf of ignorance is between the United States and Iran. If any American observer tries to analyze Iranian domestic politics, there will be at least three commentators waiting to jump on that analysis as lacking in depth and nuance.
This is all well and good, but after reading Jon Lee Anderson's New Yorker story on his visit to Iran, I think it's safe to say that other countries suffer from this same problem when they try to understand the United States. Consider the following:
Soros again!! Is there any conspiracy this guy isn't a part of?
Seriously, Ledeen and Haass loathe each other, and Ledeen and Soros probably loathe each other even more. None of these guys have any direct influence over Iran policy, and I'm willing to bet that Ledeen and Soros' indirect influence is exactly nil.
Now, take a moment to imagine a world in which Ledeen, Haass and Soros are secretly meeting to overthrow the Iranian regime, and I guarantee that the color of the sky in that world is not blue.
It's incumbent upon the American foreign policy community to develop a better appreciation of the domestic politics of other countries. But, damn, it would be good if other countries could get a better working knowledge of the U.S. foreign policy community. It's not like we're all that opaque.
[Does this matter?--ed. It does if Iran develops some serious misperceptions about U.S. intentions and capabilities. Based on the article, the Iranian leadership is well on its way towards achieving that end.]
Iran's leaders like every other dictators in the history are isolated and trapped in their inner circles. If we don't know much about them is because we simply lack experts but their problem is fundamental. If they want to fix this they have to change the whole system.
Did he mean snakily?
The quote here refers primarily to the Green Movement in Iran. It is highly unlikely that the people making decisions in Iran's government labor under any of the delusions expressed here.
What they are trying to do is sell a narrative that their domestic opposition is the product of American actions. If this Shariatmadari person had called the Green Movement the product of a conspiracy hatched by Tim Hudson and Aaron Rodgers, the relevant observation would not be that Hudson and Rodgers don't even play the same sport.
This isn't a problem that is limited to Iran, it seems to happen quite regularly. The Russians assumed that Obama's signature meant the START II treaty was finished, utterly ignorant of the fact that the Senate needs to ratify it, and the Europeans remain angry at Obama for not moving forward on climate change, again without realizing that his hands are tied by the actions (or lack thereof) of congress.
The US may be pretty bad at judging the internal mechanics of other countries, but there are times when I think we're better at understanding the rest of the world than they are at understanding us. What a depressing thought that is.
It's hardly surprising, even nations that are used to working together still manage to completely misread one another. Of course it just goes to show that the rational actor idea still isn't a reality.
And while you're at it. Educate the American public about the their own government, foreign policy establishment, and the health care system.
Wonderful words i like!coach outlet
it must be great to read minds, but once upon a time i'd have been asked before someone flatly stated that I loathe somebody else. You know, checking...
anyway you're probably half right. i've always gotten along fine with Richard Haass, but as I've written, I find George Soros very creepy. As did "60 Minutes."
that said, if he really wants to support the Iranian opposition--I have no information on that, one way or the other-- I'll work with him. Haass has already said he supports such action.
and to save you the trouble of checking, i certainly do not loathe Gene Sharp.
or you.
Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.
Read More
(8)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE