Posted By Daniel W. Drezner Share

I received the following e-mail query today: 

What I am wondering is; how did you become an expert in your field? I understand that you obviously went to college and probably got all sorts of degrees but how did you know when you were an expert in your field of knowledge?... So did you get all of your knowledge from your research while in school, or do you just read a large amount of books on whatever interests you?

This is one of those questions that sounds incredibly simplistic and yet is impossible to answer in a pithy manner. 

I mean, sure, I got a few degrees.  And I suppose getting a Ph.D. allows you to call yourself an expert over a very limited domain of knowledge.  In truth, however, I've met many, many people with doctorates who are truly quite dim about great many things (important safety tip:  never buy a book from someone who puts "Ph.D." after their name in a book).   I'm dim about a spectacular number of things.  So even expertise is quite limited in its domain. 

That said, how does one become an expert without going to the Dagobah system?  There's no one way and there's no one answer.  Here are ten ways to acquire expertise about world politics (WARNING:  does not necessarily apply to other fields of knowledge):

1)  Go to school.  There are people out there who are self-taught wunderkinds, capable of long, brilliant disquisitions about the intricacies of international relations after reading Thucydides just once.  There's a 99% chance that you are not one of these people.  For you and almost everyone else, the path to expertise is paved through college and graduate school.  So go forth and take courses on these subjects. 

2)  Read a lot.  I mean, read a whole damn lot.  Don't just read the books and articles that are assigned to you in class.  Read the stuff that you notice popping up repeatedly in the footnotes and bibliographies of your assigned reading.  Read the classics.  Read cutting edge work.  Read anything that seems of value.  When you get to the point where you think you're seeing recurring arguments, then you're approaching the cusp of expertise. 

3)  Read a newspaper every day and a magazine every week.  World politics and current events are intertwined.  The more you read about daily events, the larger your mental database of interesting events that can be used as raw data when considering various puzzles in world politics. 

4)  Hang around smart people.  Anyone who's been to graduate school knows that the best education comes from your peers.  While the image of the lonely, eccentric, brlliant grad student is a compelling narrative, it's also much more common in film than in real life.  You can pick up an awful lot from osmosis by hanging around smart people. 

5)  Never be afraid to ask a question that betrays your ignorance.  One of the smartest political scientists I ever met told me that if I didn't understand a concept or presentation, odds were good that the majority of other people in the room didn't understand either.  People who don't ask questions don't learn anything. 

6)  Walk the earthYou know, like Cain in Kung Fu.  As recent events suggest, there is an appalling lack of knowledge about how politics function in other countries.  If you can develop a good working knowledge of another country's language/culture/polity, then you can claim a relative amount of expertise. 

7)  Get a job.  There are oceans of knowledge that cannot be acquired via books, coursework, or peers.  Michael Polanyi labeled these kinds of knowledge as "tacit" - they have to be experienced to be learned.  In world politics, sometimes the best way to learn is to do. 

8)  Grow older.   Aging doesn't have a lot of upside, but one of the benefits is that you've probably done a lot more of items 1-7 than those young whippersnappers people younger than you.  Expertise has a relative quality to it, and as you grow older, you're likely to have more of it than younger generations.  

9)  Recognize your limits.  True experts don't just know a lot -- they are also aware of the vast oceans of knowledge that they don't know. 

10)  Quit reading blogs.  They rot your brain and give you cooties. 

Cate Gillon/Getty Images

 

MCKIBBINUSA

3:38 AM ET

August 20, 2010

On Becoming An Expert

At least in the technical fields, a university education leading to a masters and/or doctorate in the discipline remains the "fast start" path to acquiring the breadth and depth of knowledge that true experts must have. There are always exceptions, but not many. In many ways, it was not until I earned my doctorate that I realized how little I really know about everything. Earning a doctorate is a humbling experience for most of us, but I am glad I took that path nevertheless...

 

JUMBO

5:34 AM ET

August 20, 2010

Good point!

"Earning a doctorate is a humbling experience for most of us, but I am glad I took that path nevertheless..."
This sounds as a very sensible comment, full of common sense. It would be great if those who acquire more depth and breadth of knowledge and become aware of how little they know about everything, actually do not remain stuck and paralyzed by this finding. I find sometimes that people who acquire knowledge in true depth and breadth, and who at the same time have a good dose of common sense, end up behaving in too humble manners which impede them to bring their full contribution to their community (or maybe to the society overall, at some point).

These people should be THOSE making sure that THEIR voices are heard and listened to within their communities. Unfortunately, those with less breadth and depth, and who are very often unaware of their very limited knowledge (and at times, intellect), are those who have no inhibitions in daring to talk loud all the platitudes of the world and present these platitudes (and themselves) as "heroes" and as representing the "path to follow." [I guess that some of those who are aware of their own limitations embrace the "lazy path" and try to "cosmetize" the lack of breadth and depth in the same manner by talking platitudes loud and in a confident way. But what would the world be if everyone had a PhD?!]

What is even more sad is that "le grand public" is very often impressed by the glitzy rhetoric and totally overlooks the truly poor intellectual content of the performance. This "glitzy rhetoric" combined with the inherent simplicity of platitudes gives the Joe Six Packs among us a false sense of empowerment: JSP starts living with the impression that he actually gets it, he understands something those glam talk-heads tell him, and thus he must be damn smart. [but hey! this makes Joe happy! he's still a "six-pack," but a happy one! and if one were to be honest, what is better at the end of the day: to be a happy "Six-Pack," or a blue academic fully aware of the fact that after all those years of studying and learning, he still has mountains to conquer?! and that's how some of us decide that the middle path might be the sound one, sweep academic blues under the carpet, go on holiday, read some cheap Sandra Brown fiction, go out for way too many drinks with friends only to make life seem less solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short.]

Getting back to the main point.
Hence, besides learning to speak their minds in a confident manner, those PhDs, experts, you name them, should also learn to talk in such a way that makes it easier to connect with their community and pass the message. Something along the lines "Be smart, but learn from Sarah Palin!" I am not saying "talk like Sarah Palin" as "being smart" and "talking like Sarah Palin" presents a serious oxymoron potential.

I refrain from concluding that in a world revolving around "bread and circus," ignorance might indeed be bliss. As a world where everyone had a PhD would not be ideal, a world in which no one had a PhD would be just as undesirable, although in different ways. How about a world in which those with breadth and depth of knowledge, and awareness of their limits, would actually leave the coat of humbleness aside, learn to make their voices heard and nail the Sarah Palins of their communities or fields of expertise, etc, to the dark basement of history, where they rightly belong?

 

MCKIBBINUSA

1:40 PM ET

August 20, 2010

The Expertise Continuum

Hi Jumbo, I enjoyed your comments. Here's a piece I wrote recently about the expertise continuum which you or others may find interesting or useful:

http://wjmc.blogspot.com/2010/08/expertise-continuum.html

Thanks for the opportunity to comment.

 

LESPATRIATO

9:32 AM ET

August 22, 2010

Almost fully agreed :)

First of all, I must say that, just few days ago, I bought a "...book from someone who puts "Ph.D." after {her} name in a book". I promise, I will not do that mistake anymore!! Actually I can see what you mean.

Points 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 are great and I fully agree with you. Though I am not really sure about the importance of reading newspapers. At least we have to be careful with them. In my view reading newspapers is quite tricky. It means that you need to have other sources of information to know what is going on out there and then use the newspaper just as a "backup"...to see what the others say about what you already know. I use to say that "I learn what I do not know from the newspaper...and I learn what I know somewhere else" hee hee. Anyway, I also know that very often we cannot easily access accurate information. So let's keep reading newspaper.

Another point on which I have few concerns is about number 3. Shall I quit reading your blog then? Oh God, I will never do it. You (and few others, not many actually) are definitely not rotting my brain!!

Cheers for the very interesting post

 

APARICIO

9:35 PM ET

August 22, 2010

Talk to people who does not think like you

I would add somenthing to the list. Try to avoid gathering in groups of people who thinkn the same way you do. Try to establish conversations with people who thinks in a completely opposite way. That makes you stronger, or makes you realize when you are wrong.

AND BE HUMBLE, ALWAYS.... (That is not a tip to become an expert, but to be respected by people who knows less than u do)

 

CEOUNICOM

10:20 AM ET

August 30, 2010

re: "BE HUMBLE, ALWAYS"

...ppppptttt

Tell that to Salvador Dali, Muhammed Ali, Miles Davis, Frank Lloyd Wright, and Christopher Hitchens. Humility is a nice social grace, but no requirement for respect.

 

DEATHWARE

2:01 AM ET

August 28, 2010

 

CEOUNICOM

10:12 AM ET

August 30, 2010

David...

Awesome post.

Would you perhaps add, "find something you enjoy to be passionate about?"

One thing i've noticed amongst the highly-educated is that despite having rock solid background material in whatever field they're in, they may lack any particular expertise because they don't have *any particular bone to pick*, or any particular angle of interest that fascinates them to think about in their 'free' time, nothing that separates them from the hoi polloi of PhD's or other graduate degree holders.

Reading the newspaper everyday, and say, The Economist (peace be unto them), every week is a great prescription - but becomes all the more useful when its used as a feeder for a few specific angles of interest that a person wants to really master. I find that the real 'experts' i've met in life are people that just naturally found an angle of differentiation, and spent a few years fleshing it out, and soon they were a unique thing that few people in the world could compete with. I go to a bunch of sponsored 'roundtable salon discussions' in NYC where all the smarties hang out and drink wine and network, and its always pretty easy to identify the real superstars by their genuine passion and interest and glee in their topics of focus.

Something that really made me happy about this post is that I scored a 8 (i've not walked the earth enough) out of 10. Guess which is the other thing I fail at. (should be obvious) :) The cooties are driving me nuts.

 

CEOUNICOM

10:14 AM ET

August 30, 2010

 

Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.

Read More