Tuesday, May 17, 2011 - 10:07 PM
As the fallout from Dominique Strauss-Kahn and The Chambermaid's Tale continues, the guy from the Dos Equis commercials French public intellectual Bernard-Henri Lévy is taking quite a beating inside the United States. Lévy -- or BHL for those in the know -- is a longtime friend of Strauss-Kahn -- or DSK for, well, you get the idea. After DSK's arrest, BHL penned the following in the Daily Beast:
I do not know what actually happened Saturday, the day before yesterday, in the room of the now famous Hotel Sofitel in New York.
I do not know—no one knows, because there have been no leaks regarding the declarations of the man in question—if Dominique Strauss-Kahn was guilty of the acts he is accused of committing there, or if, at the time, as was stated, he was having lunch with his daughter [we actually know that, given the timeline, DSK's lunch with his daughter is not an alibi, as even his defenders acknowlege --DWD].
I do not know—but, on the other hand, it would be nice to know, and without delay—how a chambermaid could have walked in alone, contrary to the habitual practice of most of New York’s grand hotels of sending a “cleaning brigade” of two people, into the room of one of the most closely watched figures on the planet....
And what I know even more is that the Strauss-Kahn I know, who has been my friend for 20 years and who will remain my friend, bears no resemblance to this monster, this caveman, this insatiable and malevolent beast now being described nearly everywhere. Charming, seductive, yes, certainly; a friend to women and, first of all, to his own woman, naturally, but this brutal and violent individual, this wild animal, this primate, obviously no, it’s absurd.
This morning, I hold it against the American judge who, by delivering him to the crowd of photo hounds, pretended to take him for a subject of justice like any other....
I hold it against all those who complacently accept the account of this other young woman, this one French, who pretends to have been the victim of the same kind of attempted rape, who has shut up for eight years but, sensing the golden opportunity, whips out her old dossier and comes to flog it on television.
I do not know the extent to which BHL fact-checked his column -- for example, the French woman he accuses of being opportunistic now actually went public in 2007 only to have herself censored on French television.
I do not know the extent to which BHL is aware that DSK's other sexual indiscretions appear to have a greater element of coercion than had been previously realized.
I do not know why BHL's understanding of "cleaning brigades" is somewhat at odds with the reality of how American hotels actually function.
I do know that in the United States, BHL's reputation has fallen almost as fast as Ben Stein's.
So, this raises an exceptionally uncomfortable question for some foreign policy commentators. BHL might look like a horse's ass right now, but six or seven weeks ago, he was playing a very different role. According to BHL himself multiple press reports, Bernard-Henri Lévy was the interlocutor between Libya's rebels and the rest of the world. He therefore played a crucial role in getting French President Nicolas Sarkozy -- and therefore, the West more generally -- to intervene in Libya. This caused some consternation at the time. It would obviously set off even louder alarm bells now.
Given this role, Ben Smith tweets a very valid question: "So if the order of DSK-gate and Libya are reversed... do we go into Libya?"
This touches on some very interesting questions about temporality, causation, correlation and counterfactuals. What are the necessary or sufficient conditions for a policy outcome to occur? Do events have to happen in a particular sequence to reach a particular outcome? Was BHL either a necessary or sufficient condiition for the UN/NATO action in Libya?
My answer would be that Bernard-Henri Lévy's intellectual reputation was neither necessary nor sufficient for Operation Odyssey Dawn to take place. Consider the following:
1) French president Nicolas Sarkozy has been more circumspect than BHL in commenting on DSK, reflecting the general muteness of the French political class on the topic. It seems unlikely that BHL's ardent advocacy would have caused Sarkozy to listen to him any less on Libya.
2) One of the key aspects of the Libya decision was the compressed time frame in which it had to be made. Qaddafi's forces seemed on the verge of retaking the country within a week. Debating whether BHL was an honest broker or not seemed pretty peripheral to the real-time changes on the ground in Libya. It's worth remembering that the Arab League and the UN Security Council acted very quickly by International Organization Standard Time, and I certainly don't think BHL had much of a role to play. On the scale of things, one would have expected the "flickers" of Al Qaeda presence among the Libyan rebels to have acted as a bigger brake, and yet that fact did not derail the policy either.
3) Without in any way diminishing the allegatioons and official charges against DSK, there is a difference between the (mostly) venal sins of BHL and the French political class, and the (mostly) mortal sins of Qaddafi and his family If the Libya decision was happening right now, my hunch is that it would drown out much of the Franco-American contretemps over American puritanism French misogyny one person's failings.
What do you think?
EXPLORE:INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, CAUSAL INFERENCE, FOREIGN POLICY, LIBYA, MIDDLE EAST, PUBLIC INTELLECTUALS, SECURITY STUDIES
I think you did a better job of addressing Levy's statement than other reporters.. But 2 points I wanna make.
1. If the DSK affair had occured before Libya, Levy's opinion on the DSK affair wouldn't have received coverage from American media.
In other words, Libya was his media debut to most Americans.
2. While I disagree with the way Levy dismisses the French reporter that made similar allegations, she has followed a consistent pattern of bringing up these allegations less than a year before the past three French presidential elections. Also, she works for a right-wing newspaper. I'm not saying she wasn't assaulted. But it seems probable that she is using this alleged assault for political purposes.
Given the situation I can't see this scandal derailing the attacks in Libya, although there might be some accusations of Sarkozy going to war to obscure a French scandal.
In any case I still love the fact that people can't seem to say the following:
'We do not know whether or not the man is guilty. We know that in the U.S.A there is supposed to be a presumption of innocence until they are proven guilty. We know that it would be strange for the police to arrest this man unless they felt that it was likely he had committed a crime. Therefore we will wait until the trial occurs and we will see what evidence is brought forward.'
Just once I wish people would say that.
State capitalism in multilaterelism
The UN system seems to be getting a bit annoyed at the extent of state capitalism on show. For example the vilification of its senior officials, following their criticism of the US of course includes the hostility to S-G Kofi Annan after his adverse comments on the Iraq enterprise.
Is the World Bank next in the firing line? It repeats the view from the IMF that the dollar will be replaced as the world's reserve currency: “The most likely global currency scenario in 2025 will be a multi-currency one centred around the dollar, the euro, and the renminbi.”
Six Principles of Global Manipulation
I offer to your attention a film about six priorities of the generalized instruments of management by countries and people of Earth.
Six Principles of Global Manipulation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fF3TQ0lJnU
Anti-Qur'an Strategy of the Bible Project Wheeler-Dealers
http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1wXgXwj3MI
Nibiru and Annunakis on the Swiss francs
http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDoU3tLwc3o
French public intellectuals pushed for Libya. Does that matter?
It would have been much easier to answer this question had the US Congress considered the US and/or NATO intervention in Libya before the action began. . Had this question been examined, public debate in favor and against the military action would have set forth the reasons supporting any position. . The congressional consent procedure was avoided and with that, any spirited public debate was preempted when the intervention began.
I'm not an historian. However, I can imagine it is difficult for historians to answer this question when genuine debate is lacking.
Bernard-Henri Lévy loves rapists
First he supported Roman Polanski, who drugged and raped a child and now this. What a total creep!
French philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy has added his voice to the debate over Dominique Strauss-Kahn by writing a piece in defence of the director of the International Monetary Fund, published on the Daily Beast news website. Lévy stresses that the accusations of attempted rape levelled against Strauss-Kahn since Sunday have not yet been proven.
He writes: "I do not know what actually happened … in the room of the now famous Hotel Sofitel in New York …I do not know – no one knows, because there have been no leaks regarding the declarations of the man in question – if Dominique Strauss-Kahn was guilty of the acts he is accused of committing there, or if, at the time, as was stated, he was having lunch with his daughter."
He goes on to question how a chambermaid could have gone alone, "contrary to the habitual practice of most of New York's grand hotels of sending a 'cleaning brigade' of two people, into the room of one of the most closely watched figures on the planet".
He also casts doubt on the account of Tristane Banon, the French writer who claims Dominique Strauss-Kahn sexually assaulted her nine years ago. He says he holds it against those who "complacently" accept the account of "this other young woman, this one French", who "pretends to have been the victim of the same kind of attempted rape, who has shut up for eight years but, sensing the golden opportunity, whips out her old dossier and comes to flog it on television".
Banon described the attack in a television programme in 2007, but Strauss-Kahn's name was beeped out when the programme was broadcast. On Monday Banon's mother, Anne Mansouret, a Socialist councillor and friend of the Strauss-Kahn family, said she had persuaded her daughter not to press charges at the time of the alleged assault, a decision she says she now regrets.
Lévy writes: "What I do know is that nothing in the world can justify a man being thus thrown to the dogs." He continues: "Nothing … permits the entire world to revel in the spectacle, this morning, of this handcuffed figure, his features blurred by 30 hours of detention and questioning, but still proud." He rails against the American judge who, "by delivering [Strauss-Kahn] to the crowd of photo hounds, pretended to take him for a subject of justice like any other."
Lévy says in the article that the man he calls a friend of 20 years, "bears no resemblance to this monster, this caveman, this insatiable and malevolent beast now being described nearly everywhere. Charming, seductive, yes, certainly; a friend to women and, first of all, to his own woman, naturally, but this brutal and violent individual, this wild animal, this primate, obviously no, it's absurd."
At the beginning of last week Ségolène Royal denied rumours that Lévy was trying to negotiate a rapprochement between herself and her then fellow would-be Socialist candidate for France's presidential election in 2012, Dominique Strauss-Kahn.
Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.
Read More
(6)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE