Posted By Daniel W. Drezner Share

Barack Obama addressed AIPAC yesterday in anticipation of Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to Washington, which has led to some interesting responses.  There's something in Carol Lee and Jay Solomon's Wall Street Journal write-up that is worth considering in more detail, however: 

Mr. Obama's efforts to recalibrate the administration's position—cooling talk of war while nodding to the concerns of hawks such as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—won some applause, including from the Israeli leader. Some of Israel's strongest backers on Capitol Hill weren't appeased, however.

"I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say," Mr. Obama said Sunday at the annual conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Washington's most powerful pro-Israel lobbying group....

By clarifying the administration's willingness to use force, the White House also hopes to lessen the chance Mr. Netanyahu will order a unilateral strike.

Mr. Netanyahu, who arrived in Washington on Sunday, praised Mr. Obama's speech and said it was an important step in unifying the U.S. and Israeli positions on Iran. "I appreciated the fact that he said that Israel must be able to defend itself, by itself, against any threat," he said in a written statement.

Rep. Eric Cantor, the No. 2 Republican in the House of Representatives, said the speech was "a step in the right direction," but that "we need to make sure that this president is also going to stand by Israel and not allow his administration to somehow speak contrary to what our ally thinks is in its best interest." (emphasis added)

Now, this bolded part of the quote is quite extraordinary, if you think about it.  Apparently, Cantor's standard with respect to American policy towards Israel is that the U.S. government cannot and should not contradict anything that Israel's government says.  What's good for Israel's national interests -- as defined solely by Israel -- serves American interests as well. 

Step back for a second and ask yourself if this is true of any other U.S. ally.  A NATO member?  Nah, we disagree with them all the time.  Japan?  Nope, there was a pretty bruising fight with that country's government on Okinawa bases just a few years ago.  Canada?  Hell, Mitt Romney pretty much made it clear that the U.S. is gonna get Canada's oil and I heard nary a peep of criticism from the GOP foreign policy establishment.  I can't think of a Latin American, Pacific Rim or Central Asian ally that meets this criteria. 

A few months ago, I asked whether, in the eyes of some, Israel was now the most super-special ally we have.  I think statements like Cantor's are an excellent signal that the answer appears to be yes.  So I hereby propose the following definition:  if a prominent U.S. official or foreign policy commentator proposes a standard for U.S. policy towards Israel that would never be used for any other U.S. ally or treaty partner, then they have gone the full Cantor

With the AIPAC conference going on this week, I hereby summon my readers to alert me to any further statements or criticisms that suggest the U.S. alliance with Israel is in a super-special, unique category that No Other Allies can join.   

 

BILL HARSHAW

5:57 PM ET

March 5, 2012

What Has Changed in 31 Years?

When Israel attacked Iraq's reactor in 1981, the Security Council condemned it and Reagan's UN Ambassador compared it to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Presumably if Israel goes ahead with an attack on Iran, our response will be different, but why? The 1981 precedent looks better given the passage of time and 2 wars against Saddam? We're more pro-Israel now? Iran looks more threatening than Saddam did then? Evangelical Protestants have more clout in US politics now??

 

REALREALIST

6:00 PM ET

March 5, 2012

more bad news out of germany and japan

http://www.debka.com/article/21794/

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/03/04/north-korea-nuclear-warhead-test-for-iran/

http://nknews.org/2012/03/german-paper-north-korea-tested-nuclear-warhead-for-iran/

http://bnn-news.com/die-welt-iran-nuclear-tests-north-korea-52387

 

ANTIMKO

6:11 PM ET

March 5, 2012

Propaganda much?

These stories are as credible as Kim Jun Il's democracy.

 

MOHAMEDABED

10:12 PM ET

March 5, 2012

they're credible if you read them

which apparently you haven't.

 

DAVID CARLTON

6:02 PM ET

March 5, 2012

Alliance?

Via Dan Larison, last week's Christain Science Monitor pointed out that there is no treaty obligation for the US to come to Israel's defense. In what sense is Israel even an ally? What formal obligations do we have to Israel, and what formal obligations does Israel have to us? Obviously, there are strong informal [but not terribly well defined] obligations, but what are the formal ones?

 

REALREALIST

6:38 PM ET

March 5, 2012

yes, alliance...

as in alliances like with great britain, france, canada, spain, germany, etc..etc...

and yes, america owes israel its support after 60 yrs of israel fighting on the front lines against extremism...

anyone remember palestians in the West Bank and Gaza CHEERING immediately after the planes hit the world trade centers? yes, they were cheering...handing out celebration candies to little kids...

amazing how quickly americans forget...

 

FREETHINKER12

9:07 PM ET

March 5, 2012

US owes isreal nothing.

US owes isreal nothing. Isreal wasnt fighting extremism, it was fighting the people it stole land from. There were no dancing arabs after 9/11. How easy is it to find a video of people dancing and cheering and throw it in a news reel to pass off as a current video to a current event?

US owes isreal nothing. NONE of our interests even align, the US is obviously headed toward a containment policy with a nuclear iran but isreal is trying to force us to go to war with iran for them. Vetoing condemnation of settlements is a HUGE embarassment to the US. Isreal is an ungrateful ally that contributes nothing, as Sec of Defense Robert Gates stated. They take and give nothing. A parasite so to speak

 

OLSONIST

9:25 PM ET

March 5, 2012

Jonathan Pollard USS

Jonathan Pollard
USS Liberty
Israeli arms sales to China http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4101961.stm

Some ally.

 

SRAM

11:46 AM ET

March 7, 2012

Re: Alliance?

Yes, there was rejoicing in Palestine. But folks like you never speak of the other side, because it is inconvenient to your narrative.

See: http://cellar.org/showthread.php?threadid=490

Do you see "Palestinian women mourn during a vigil outside the U.S. consulate". Do you see the reaction in Bangladesh, a muslim country? I don't believe you did. You neocons are so blinded by your hatred and your uniform story line that you will not believe anything that strays from that thinking.

 

A.S.

6:46 PM ET

March 5, 2012

Odd

What an odd post. Cantor says that Obama ought no undermine Israel by contradicting it. Prof. Drezner calls this a special deal just for Israel. Really? I guess in Realist Ivory Tower World, we ought to undermine our allies all the time, but here in the reality-based community, we think allies ought not undermine each other.

PS, the Canada "example" Prof Drezner provides makes no sense for the purpose he offers it.

This post is a massive FAIL.

 

SCOTT83

8:49 PM ET

March 5, 2012

getting really old, really fast

Just what percentage of foreignpolicy magazine and website are now fully devoted to the "Israel Lobby"?

Why don't you just rename it the Israel Lobby Journal?

This site is now as interesting as watching paint dry.

 

REALREALIST

10:27 PM ET

March 5, 2012

scott, your absolutely right...this site is a zoo...

on the one hand they allow an article asking why american media are so obsessed with israel and yet on the other hand as everyone can see, FP itself has about 3 articles a day on the very subject....lol....

its no secret FP is a left leaning site using its platform to support partisan politics. Its a far cry from genuine foreign policy discourse.

have you ever looked into rothkopf's backround? its obvious what he is using this site to try to effect. Its just another group dedicated to trying to persuade people how to think, how to live, how to vote...etc..etc...this aint no news group, its left wing indoctrination under the guise of intellectualism...in fact, its quite base and disingenuous.

 

MOHAMEDABED

10:31 PM ET

March 5, 2012

amen to that

it's like seeing a bunch of cowering children moaning about the boogeyman. Though, in this case the children are mediocre academics and the boogeyman is the dreaded AIPAC.

 

JOHNBOY4546

1:43 AM ET

March 6, 2012

"Why don't you just rename it the Israel Lobby Journal?"

Sure, let's all pretend that Israel *doesn't* have a disproportionate influence on American domestic politics.

Sure, let's all pretend that.

Meanwhile, the No. 2 Republican in the House can say things like this:
"we need to make sure that this president is also going to stand by Israel and not allow his administration to somehow speak contrary to what our ally thinks is in its best interest"

Apparently we are meant to ignore this explicit declaration by an important Congressman that the role of the Presidency is to act as a spruiker and/or a shill for Israel's Singular Self-interest.

Apparently we are meant to ignore the impications of such a doctrine because, well, because Scott here finds it all too boring for words.....

 

MOHAMEDABED

6:00 AM ET

March 6, 2012

sure, lets also all pretend

you have something intelligent to say. Let's also pretend you are not a bigot and antisemite. Let's also pretend you do something with your life other than bash Israel and support Iran. Let's also pretend you don't live at home and have no employment skills. Imagining is fun, isn't it?

 

DLT

6:32 AM ET

March 6, 2012

You Pretend to be Mohamed ABED.

Why don’t you admit that you are pretending to be Mohamed ABED, but in fact, you are on the payroll of the Israeli Mossad.

It is also conceivable that you’re a land thieve writing from one of the illegal Jewish settlement, stolen from an indigenous Palestinian family on the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

It is also possible that you are a cheap Zionist, who loves to lie openly for Israel and you are pretending to be Mohamed ABED.

 

JOHNBOY4546

10:16 AM ET

March 6, 2012

"Let's also pretend you are not a bigot and antisemite"

Congratulations, you worked it out: I Don't Like Israel.

Your reasons WHY I don't like Israel are, however, totally and completely F**ked Up.

 

MOHAMEDABED

4:16 PM ET

March 6, 2012

DTL And Johnboy two idiots in a pod

DLT - complaining about "land thieves" --- this is kind of funny coming from someone on native american and mexican land. Please do tell me how the Sioux indians just handed you your land with a smile on their face and gladly walked a few hundred miles with all their posessions onto a reservation. And wait, how did you get the whole South West? Oh, the Mexicans just smiled and shook your hand and gave it to you! Right?.....

The Palestinians are Arabs....from Arabia. They are more indigenous than any other group of people in the Middle East. Just ask the Copts, Kurds, Berbers, and Assyrians. They will tell you know the Arabs came from Arabia and took over the land.

"Why don’t you admit that you are pretending to be Mohamed ABED, but in fact, you are on the payroll of the Israeli Mossad."

----I have to say, I am flattered you think I am a Mossad agent. I wish I got paid for this or did work for the Mossad. What a fun job that would be. However, much to your surprise, people actually post supporting Israel, without being paid. I know, it must be surprising to you that people can disagree with your opinions and not be hired by anyone to do so. It is called living in a free society that allows free thought and expression. This must be a shock to you

As to Johnboy - yes we know the reasons why you dislike Israel....you are misinformed, bigoted, can't speak Arabic or Hebrew, and know very little about actual life there. Mostly, you are just bigoted.

Not to mention you make assertions you can't back up...such as claiming that "debkafile" is an army of the IDF.

 

JOHNBOY4546

9:20 PM ET

March 6, 2012

"The Palestinians are Arabs....from Arabia"

Just as israelis are Jews.... from Jewland.

Err, no, that's not right.

What makes a Jew a Jew has nothing to do with where they "came from", so why do you insist that what makes an Arab an Arab is where they "came from"?

Oh, gosh!, an Arab is an Arab because his principle language is Arabic, and his culture is shared with all the other people who speak Arabic, and not because he is "from Arabia".

Got that, dimwit?

 

MOHAMEDABED

11:27 PM ET

March 6, 2012

haha you call me a dimwit, but you can't prove any

assertion you make. Such as claiming that Debkafile is a wing of the IDF. Again, please prove it. Arabs are people from Arabia. Arabic is not just a language. Got that dimwit. The "Arabs" are not indigenous people. They came and pushed / conquored / assimilated the other peoples in the region such as Jews, Kurds, Berbers, Copts etc.

 

JOHNBOY4546

2:58 AM ET

March 8, 2012

"Again, please prove it."

I shall use Netanyahu-logic(tm) to prove it:
"If it looks like a duck, if it walks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, then what is it? That's right. It's a duck. But this duck is an IDF duck!"

If you want to argue with *that* logic then I have the transcript of a certain Very Recent Speech that I'd like to show you......

"Arabs are people from Arabia."

Simply untrue.

"Arabic is not just a language."

Nor did I say that it was.

I said this: "an Arab is an Arab because his principle language is Arabic, and his culture is shared with all the other people who speak Arabic"

That definition of an Arab is much, much more accurate than this dimwitted definition: "Arabs are people from Arabia".

Demonstrably so, because I can list a number of Arab countries that stretch across the entire northern part of the African continent, starting with Mauritania on the west alllllllll the way over to Somalia on the east.

None of which (and I do I need to point this out?) Is In Arabia.

 

BLUE13326

9:02 PM ET

March 5, 2012

Part of it is just the usual

Part of it is just the usual election year crap; trying to move to the right of Obama and paint him as weak. Doubt it will work, but w/ever

 

MOHAMEDABED

10:25 PM ET

March 5, 2012

Super Special Relationship?

Come on, to say that Israel is the only US ally that has some special relationship is to give a knee-jerk reaction to a statement made by Cantor.

How about the US "super special relationship" with Saudi Arabia?

The Bush Administration redcated 28 pages of the Joint Intelligence Report of the U.S. Congress in order to whitewash and cover-up Saudi Arabia's role in 9/11. Pretty extraordinary.

Saudi Arabia was the primary financier of al qaeda, and the US does still consults with Saudi Arabia on its middle east policy and remains allies:
Al Qaeda, says William Wechsler, the task force director, was "a constant fundraising machine." And where did it raise most of those funds? The evidence was indisputable: Saudi Arabia. America's longtime ally and the world's largest oil producer had somehow become, as a senior Treasury Department official put it, "the epicenter" of terrorist financing.

Saudi Nationals were spirited out of the US on private planes after 9/11, when all other flights were grounded.

Saudi Arabia gets the largest arms packages in the history of the US (over $60.5 billion) , with its advanced fighter jet fleet set to be the largest in the middle east.

And in 1990-1991 the US went to war - sent troops who fought and died - for the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. The US has never sent a single military service member to fight for Israel.

And in terms of Saudi Arabia dictating US policy - The Saudis managed to kick US troops out of their bases and airfields in Saudi Arabia AFTER 9/11. The Japanese couldn't do it to US troops in Okinawa, and we are at peace in the Asia-Pacific. However, Saudi Arabia managed to close down US bases while the US was at war in the CENTCOM region.

 

JOHNBOY4546

12:01 PM ET

March 8, 2012

"Saudi Arabia gets the largest arms packages in the history"

Hey, at least they are using their own money.

Unlike some countries I could name.......

 

MARKJ12

5:26 AM ET

March 26, 2012

Saudi Arabia

An argument can be made that Saudi Arabia has a very special relationship with the US too. However, this is a two-way relationship that the US benefits from greatly. On the other hand what would the US lose if it severed ties with Israel and decided to let them go it alone? Nothing much, other than being able to keep countries like Iran honest.

 

REALREALIST

10:29 PM ET

March 5, 2012

 

FOREHEAD1

11:11 PM ET

March 5, 2012

realrealist

i notice your hasbara has a one eyed view; usually with no facts to back up. paid poster perhaps?

 

MOHAMEDABED

11:25 PM ET

March 5, 2012

its flattering to realrealist that you think he is a paid poster

He must be confounding you to the extent that you think he is a professional.

As for yourself, where are your substantive comments?

 

JOHNBOY4546

11:25 PM ET

March 5, 2012

Just out of curiosity.....

You mention a number of countries that are US Allies.

They are allies because the USA has signed alliances with them e.g. NATO, ANZUS, etc. etc.

Just out of curiousity, can someone tell me the name of the USA/Israel treaty of mutual defence?

 

MOHAMEDABED

6:07 AM ET

March 6, 2012

The US won't sign a treaty with Israel for mutual defense

and it won't be admitted into NATO, even though Israel has stated a desire. So, it's not for Israel's lack of asking. Israel did deliver soviet tanks, radar, missiles, etc. to the US during the cold war - something no other US ally ever did. Israel also saved Jordan from Syrian invasion based on US request. Etc.

Curious, what did NATO member Greece do?

 

JOHNBOY4546

10:24 AM ET

March 6, 2012

"So, it's not for Israel's lack of asking. "

So sorry, but Israel has resisted any suggestion that it sign a formal treaty with anyone.

The reason why is obvious: treaties create mutual obligations, whereas Israel always wants everything to be a one-way street.

 

MOHAMEDABED

4:22 PM ET

March 6, 2012

again, more assertions without proof by Johnboy (idiot)

this idiot lives in a fantasy land. Israel won't sign treaties? Except for those minor things, like peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan.....And of course there is the free trade agreement with the US, the free trade agreement with MERCOSUR, the Israel-EU association agreement. Israel also tried to join NATO all the way back in 1954.

So once again, Johnboy speaks out of his bulbous ass. Please, stop being such a misinformed bigoted idiot.

 

RIREDINPA

5:52 PM ET

March 6, 2012

Last time I checked...

a Fair Trade Agreement does not a mutual defense pact make. Regardless, the point being made and the one the Israel defenders are missing is that no standing member of Congress or any other branch of our government should be suggesting that the President of the United States and his administration base our foreign policy on making sure it isn't contrary to what Israel (or fill in any other country here) feels is in their best interest.

America does what is in it's best interest. One would hope that as we do we are constantly looking to make our foreign policy decisions so that they are win/win for all parties involved but at the end of the day the final decision has to be what is best for this nation.

 

MOHAMEDABED

6:10 PM ET

March 6, 2012

it was an example of a treaty not a defense pact

correct. However, America has always done what is in its best interest regardless of Israel. The US invaded Iraq in 1991, with the SCUDS flying into Israel, and forced Israel to sit on its hands. The US also forced Israel from totally starving out Egypt's 6th Army in 1973. And on the threat of withholding aid and other monetary incentives, the US forced Israel to sit down with the PLO at the Madrid Conference. So the idea that the tail wagging the dog is quite ludicrous.

However, Israel has asked for mutual defense agreements and closer security arrangements, contrary to what others have suggested. The most recent was asking for an office at NATO, which the Turks were vetoing.

 

JOHNBOY4546

9:13 PM ET

March 6, 2012

Israel has NEVER asked for a mutual defense treaty with ANYONE

It has rebuffed any suggestion by the Americans that such a treaty be negotiated between the USA and Israel.

Israel. Does. Not. Want. One.

Treaties have terms.
Treaties spell out mutual obligations.

The very notion is anathema to the Israelis, who want a free hand to go BANG! on anyone they want, when they want, where they want, and for whatever reason suits their purpose.

 

MOHAMEDABED

11:29 PM ET

March 6, 2012

Oh johnboy you are so stupid its amazing

Israel did ask to join NATO as early as 1954, when Abba Eban was Israel's foreign minister. It is not very hard to figure out. Israel also asked as recently as 2011 to set up an office with NATO, which was rebuffed by the Turks.

It's amazing what you can learn by just reading a bit. If only you could try it Johnboy. Also johboy, I'm still waiting for your hard evidence that Debkafile is a wing of the IDF.

 

JOHNBOY4546

12:07 PM ET

March 8, 2012

"Israel did ask to join NATO as early as 1954"

No, I believe you will find that it was the USSR who asked to join NATO in 1954.

Strange, but true...... unlike your nonsense.

 

ZC

12:26 AM ET

March 6, 2012

Israel Lobby? Drezner?

Anyone here who thinks Dan Drezner is a big advocate for the Israel Lobby hypothesis, clearly hasn't spent much time on this website, or reading any of his critiques of Mearsheimer and Walt.

 

JOHNBOY4546

1:48 AM ET

March 6, 2012

"then they have gone the full Cantor"

Heck, it'd be easier to simply list the members of Congress who haven't gone the full Cantor.

Let's see.... there's Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul and...errr... there's.... umm....

 

MOHAMEDABED

6:10 AM ET

March 6, 2012

johnboy just because people disagree with you....

doesn't mean you have to a brain spasm. We all know you are an Israel-hater, bigot, and probable Jew-hater. you voice it in nearly every single post that mentions Israel.

 

JOHNBOY4546

10:19 AM ET

March 6, 2012

One More Time For The Slow People

Slow People: "We all know you are an Israel-hater, bigot, and probable Jew-hater."

I am, indeed, an "Israel-hater", precisely because I think that the ruling regime is exceptionally "hateable".

As to *why* I think that Israel is so easy to hate is, indeed, where you and I part company.

 

MOHAMEDABED

4:29 PM ET

March 6, 2012

yeah because you are a misinformed idiot

like the above statement that israel never tried to sign any treaties. Even though back in 1954, Israel tried to join NATO, under Abba Ebban's lead and has requested ever since. Even back in 2011, Israel requested to open an office as part of NATO’s Mediterranean Dialogue initiative, which Turkey claims it "thwarted." And, Israel was made a Major Non-NATO ally of the US, along with Australia, Egypt, Japan, Jordan, New Zealand, and South Korea.

Johnboy you are an idiot and full of moronic rage.

 

JOHNBOY4546

9:42 PM ET

March 6, 2012

"in 1954, Israel tried to join NATO"

Utter Nonsense.

Take one look at the membership of NATO in 1954, and you tell me if it made the slightest bit of sense for Israel to "try to join" an organization that at that point didn't even include West Germany.

The claim that Israel tried to join NATO in 1954 is hasbarah bullshit: Israel made no such formal application, precisely because in 1954 the proposition that Europe could be better defended by bringing a Leventine country into the alliance was (and still is, when it comes to it) utterly preposterous.

What Abba Eban really wanted in 1954 - and pushed hard for - was a "security guarantee" from the USA i.e. a pledge by the Americans that they would come to Israel's aid, without any concommittent obligation by Israel to come to the USA's aid.

All the self-interested benefits of a treaty... without the mutual obligations of a treaty.

That's got "Israel" written all over it, doesn't it?

 

JOHNBOY4546

9:52 PM ET

March 6, 2012

Nice list on countries ya' got there....

"And, Israel was made a Major Non-NATO ally of the US, along with Australia, Egypt, Japan, Jordan, New Zealand, and South Korea."

Australia: ANZUS treaty
Japan: Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan
New Zealand: ANZUS treaty
South Korea: ROK-US Mutual Defense Treaty

Get my drift?

Everywhere OTHER THAN the middle east you see that the USA has "allies" because it signs a formal treaty of alliance with those countries.

Not so in the middle east: the USA may call them "allies", but the arrangement is simply an informal one i.e. the USA has no more formal obligation to the defence of Israel than it does to the defence of either Egypt or Jordan.

Q: So why doesn't the USA have formal defence pacts with those middle east "allies"?
A: Israel, who keeps that Big Dawg a' waggin'

 

MOHAMEDABED

11:33 PM ET

March 6, 2012

LOLZ you failed to respond

to the proof that Israel did try to join NATO in 1954. And in terms of security treaties between the US and Israel you have:

Agreement relating to mutual defense assistance, Agreement creating the Joint Political Military Group and Joint Security Assistance Program, Mutual logistic support agreement, Memorandum of Agreement regarding joint political, security and economic cooperation

Johnboy, your jew-hatred seems to blind you and keep you from doing basic fact checking! Please go exercise, as this hatred might cause your fat body to have a heart attack!

 

MOHAMEDABED

5:40 PM ET

March 7, 2012

haha

johnboy's "proof" that Abba Ebban did not try to get Israel into NATO in 1954 is his opinion. Very convincing indeed. LOL!

 

JOHNBOY4546

3:03 AM ET

March 8, 2012

"to the proof that Israel did try to join NATO in 1954"

You have made an assertion.
You have not provided any proof for that assertion.

"Agreement relating to mutual defense assistance, Agreement creating the Joint Political Military Group and Joint Security Assistance Program, Mutual logistic support agreement, Memorandum of Agreement regarding joint political, security and economic cooperation "

Not a one of which is a treaty of alliance, none provide any mutual obligation to defend the other.

Each and every one relates to the economic assistance provided by the USA to the state of Israel via freebie military equipment.

 

JOHNBOY4546

3:10 AM ET

March 8, 2012

Hmmm, I'm supposed to prove a negative.

"johnboy's "proof" that Abba Ebban did not try to get Israel into NATO in 1954 is his opinion"

You appear to be insisting that *I* have to prove a negative.

Let's now put that alongside your insistence that *I* am obligated to prove that debkafiles is an IDF front organization, while you don't have to do anything to "prove" that it isn't.

Well, I guess that's hasbarah for you i.e. "consistency" is an optional-extra.

Dude, you are the person who insists that in 1954 Abba Eban submitted a membership application for Israel to join NATO.

The onus is therefore on you to show me that application form, it ain't on me to "prove" that this never happened.

 

SIN NOMBRE

3:17 AM ET

March 6, 2012

So confusing

Well, whatever you do just don't call Cantor an "Israel Firster."

I mean ... just because he *says* that the President of the United States and his entire administration must always follow what Israel says doesn't *mean* that ...

... oh, wait....

 

MOHAMEDABED

6:11 AM ET

March 6, 2012

durrrrr......it's called partisan politics

but sin nombre is too stupid to understand that. By the way Sin...you post on numerous blogs nearly ever day. Do you even have a job? Or do you just live at home in your basement? Making uneducated and snarky remarks is not a career....it's just pathetic.

 

Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.

Read More